» Articles » PMID: 21153136

Steady-state Concentrations of MRNA Encoding the Receptor for Luteinizing Hormone During the Estrous Cycle and Following Prostaglandin F(2α) Treatment of Ewes

Overview
Journal Endocrine
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2010 Dec 15
PMID 21153136
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A partial cDNA was used to measure steady-state concentrations of mRNA encoding the receptor for luteinizing hormone (LH) in ovine corpora lutea. In experiment 1, luteal tissue and purified preparations of small and large steroidogenic luteal cells (n=4 per day) were obtained on days 3 (tissue only), 6, 9, 12 and 15 of the estrous cycle (estrus=day 0). Steady-state concentrations (fmoles receptor mRNA/μg poly(A)(+) RNA) and total quantities of mRNA (fmoles/corpus luteum) encoding the receptor for LH in luteal tissue increased (P<0.05) from day 3 to days 9 and 12 of the cycle; values on days 6 and 15 were intermediate. Small luteal cells contained at least four-fold greater (P<0.001) concentrations of mRNA encoding the receptor for LH than large luteal cells on days 6, 9, 12 and 15 of the cycle. In experiment 2, ewes on days 11 or 12 of the cycle received an infusion of either 1 μmol prostaglandin F(2α) (PGF(2α)) or saline into the ovarian artery. Luteal tissue was collected 1 (n=6), 4 (n=5), 12 (n=5) or 24 (n=5) h following PGF(2α) infusion, and 0 (no infusion;n=3), 12 (n=3) or 24 (n=4) h following saline administration. Concentrations of progesterone in sera decreased (P<0.05) within 12 h and remained low, whereas luteal weight and concentrations of progesterone in luteal tissue did not decrease (P<0.05) until 24 h after PGF(2α) treatment. Steady-state concentrations of mRNA encoding the receptor for LH were reduced (P<0.05) within 4 h of PGF(2α) infusion, and continued to decrease at 12 and 24 h post treatment. Calculated amounts of mRNA encoding the receptor for LH per corpus luteum were reduced (P<0.05) at 12 h after the PGF(2α) treatment and were 10% (P<0.05) of the values in saline-treated ewes at 24 h post-treatment. The increase during the estrous cycle in steady-state concentrations of mRNA encoding the receptor for LH appears to occur prior to the previously observed increase in number of receptors for LH. Following PGF(2α)-induced luteal regression, concentrations of mRNA encoding LH receptor decreased prior to the previously reported decrease in LH binding. Thus, changes in the number of receptors for LH in ovine luteal tissue during luteal development and luteolysis appears to be preceded by corresponding changes in mRNA encoding this receptor.

Citing Articles

Profiling of luteal transcriptome during prostaglandin F2-alpha treatment in buffalo cows: analysis of signaling pathways associated with luteolysis.

Shah K, Tripathy S, Suganthi H, Rudraiah M PLoS One. 2014; 9(8):e104127.

PMID: 25102061 PMC: 4125180. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104127.


Genome-wide gene expression analysis reveals a dynamic interplay between luteotropic and luteolytic factors in the regulation of corpus luteum function in the bonnet monkey (Macaca radiata).

Priyanka S, Jayaram P, Sridaran R, Medhamurthy R Endocrinology. 2008; 150(3):1473-84.

PMID: 18988674 PMC: 2654745. DOI: 10.1210/en.2008-0840.


Luteal expression of steroidogenic factor-1 mRNA during the estrous cycle and in response to luteotropic and luteolytic stimuli in ewes.

Juengel J, Larrick T, Meberg B, Niswender G Endocrine. 1999; 9(3):227-32.

PMID: 10221587 DOI: 10.1385/ENDO:9:3:227.


Concentration of mRNA encoding 3 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase/delta 5,delta 4 isomerase (3 beta-HSD) and 3 beta-HSD enzyme activity following treatment of ewes with prostaglandin F2 alpha.

Juengel J, Meberg B, McIntush E, Smith M, Niswender G Endocrine. 1998; 8(1):45-50.

PMID: 9666344 DOI: 10.1385/ENDO:8:1:45.

References
1.
Wiltbank M, Diskin M, Flores J, Niswender G . Regulation of the corpus luteum by protein kinase C. II. Inhibition of lipoprotein-stimulated steroidogenesis by prostaglandin F2 alpha. Biol Reprod. 1990; 42(2):239-45. DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod42.2.239. View

2.
FULLER G, Hansel W . Regression of sheep corpora lutea after treatment with antibovine luteinizing hormone. J Anim Sci. 1970; 31(1):99-103. DOI: 10.2527/jas1970.31199x. View

3.
Kaltenbach C, GRABER J, Niswender G, NALBANDOV A . Luteotrophic properties of some pituitary hormones in nonpregnant or pregnant hypophysectomized ewes. Endocrinology. 1968; 82(4):818-24. DOI: 10.1210/endo-82-4-818. View

4.
Niswender G . Influence of the site of conjugation on the specificity of antibodies to progesterone. Steroids. 1973; 22(3):413-24. DOI: 10.1016/0039-128x(73)90104-9. View

5.
Gudermann T, Birnbaumer M, Birnbaumer L . Evidence for dual coupling of the murine luteinizing hormone receptor to adenylyl cyclase and phosphoinositide breakdown and Ca2+ mobilization. Studies with the cloned murine luteinizing hormone receptor expressed in L cells. J Biol Chem. 1992; 267(7):4479-88. View