» Articles » PMID: 21152458

The Impact of Patient Education on the Quality of Inpatient Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2010 Dec 15
PMID 21152458
Citations 41
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: For patients requiring colonoscopy while admitted to hospital, achieving adequate cleansing of the colon is often difficult.

Objectives: To assess the impact of patient education, in the form of both counselling and written instructions, on bowel cleanliness at colonoscopy.

Methods: A total of 38 inpatients at a tertiary care hospital in Vancouver, British Columbia, who were referred to the gastroenterology service for colonoscopy were enrolled in the present study. Sixteen patients were randomly assigned to the intervention group, while 22 patients comprised the control group. Both groups received a clear liquid diet and 4 L of a commercially available bowel preparation. The intervention group also received a brief counselling session and written instructions outlining the methods and rationale for bowel preparation before colonoscopy. Bowel cleanliness was assessed by the endoscopist using a five-point rating scale.

Results: The two groups were similar with respect to demographics, the indication for colonoscopy and findings at colonoscopy. The median bowel cleanliness scores in the control group and the enhanced-instruction group were 3.0 and 2.0, respectively (P=0.001).

Conclusion: Patient counselling and written instructions are inexpensive, safe and simple interventions. Such interventions are an effective means of optimizing colonoscopy preparation in the inpatient setting.

Citing Articles

Prospective Study of Dot Phrase Instructions to Improve Quality and Timeliness of Bowel Preparation for Inpatient Colonoscopies.

Kurin M, Adil S, Patel R, Alikhan M, Elangovan A, Tripathi A Cureus. 2024; 16(11):e74040.

PMID: 39712772 PMC: 11659083. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.74040.


Factors influencing inpatient bowel preparation: a scoping review.

Marchildon M, Jackson J, Rankin J J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024; 39(12):2487-2503.

PMID: 39165168 PMC: 11660208. DOI: 10.1111/jgh.16721.


Impact of Multimedia CD Education on the Quality of Colon Preparation; A Single-Blind Randomized Study.

Ejtehadi F, Safarpour A, Nemati R, Aminlari L, Zare E, Sivandzadeh G Middle East J Dig Dis. 2023; 14(4):431-436.

PMID: 37547506 PMC: 10404098. DOI: 10.34172/mejdd.2022.304.


Could atmospheric temperature impact on adequate colon cleansing for colonoscopy? An observational, single-institution study.

Maione F, Manigrasso M, Milone M, Gennarelli N, Maione R, Cantore G Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023; 38(1):96.

PMID: 37055678 PMC: 10102074. DOI: 10.1007/s00384-023-04393-x.


Improving Colonoscopy Bowel Preparation and Reducing Patient Anxiety Through Recently Developed Online Information Resource: A Cross-sectional Study.

Jain A, Jain R, Nugent Z, Solati Z, Davidson D, Shafer L J Can Assoc Gastroenterol. 2022; 5(4):161-168.

PMID: 35919762 PMC: 9340630. DOI: 10.1093/jcag/gwab047.


References
1.
Sharara N, Adam V, Crott R, Barkun A . The costs of colonoscopy in a Canadian hospital using a microcosting approach. Can J Gastroenterol. 2008; 22(6):565-70. PMC: 2660815. DOI: 10.1155/2008/854984. View

2.
Vanner S, MacDonald P, Paterson W, Prentice R, Da Costa L, Beck I . A randomized prospective trial comparing oral sodium phosphate with standard polyethylene glycol-based lavage solution (Golytely) in the preparation of patients for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 1990; 85(4):422-7. View

3.
Hendry P, Jenkins J, Diament R . The impact of poor bowel preparation on colonoscopy: a prospective single centre study of 10,571 colonoscopies. Colorectal Dis. 2007; 9(8):745-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01220.x. View

4.
Rex D, Imperiale T, Latinovich D, Bratcher L . Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002; 97(7):1696-700. DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05827.x. View

5.
Reilly T, Walker G . Reasons for poor colonic preparation with inpatients. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2004; 27(3):115-7. DOI: 10.1097/00001610-200405000-00004. View