» Articles » PMID: 21147821

Cytogenetic Analysis of Human Blastocysts with the Use of FISH, CGH and ACGH: Scientific Data and Technical Evaluation

Overview
Journal Hum Reprod
Date 2010 Dec 15
PMID 21147821
Citations 78
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Recent studies have suggested that biopsy of several trophectoderm (TE) cells from blastocysts followed by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) analysis might represent an optimal strategy for aneuploidy detection, but few data on accuracy are available. The main question concerns the rate of mosaicism at the blastocyst stage, and to what extent this might cause misdiagnoses. We assessed blastocyst aneuploidy and mosaicism rates and evaluated the accuracy and efficiency of CGH and microarray-CGH (aCGH) for TE analysis.

Methods: A total of 52 blastocysts, from 20 couples, were biopsied and their chromosomes examined by CGH. The remaining cells were spread and tested by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Of the 52 blastocysts, 20 underwent a second TE biopsy and were tested using aCGH.

Results: CGH and aCGH produced results for 98% of TE samples. 42.3% of blastocysts were uniformly euploid, 30% were uniformly aneuploid and 32.4% were mosaic. Of the mosaic embryos, 15.4% were found to be composed of a mixture of different aneuploid cell lines, while 17% contained both normal and aneuploid cells. Mosaic diploid-aneuploid blastocysts with >30% normal cells accounted for <6% of analysed embryos.

Conclusions: Comprehensive chromosome screening and follow-up assessment of large numbers of cells provided a unique insight into the cytogenetics of human blastocysts. Meiotic and post-zygotic errors leading to mosaicism were common. However, most mosaic blastocysts contained no normal cells. Hence, CGH or aCGH TE analysis is an accurate aneuploidy detection tool and may assist in identifying viable euploid embryos with higher implantation potential.

Citing Articles

Correlation among blastocoel fluid DNA level, apoptotic genes expression and preimplantation aneuploidy.

Khajehoseini F, Noormohammadi Z, Eftekhari-Yazdi P, Yazdi P, Gourabi H, Pazhoomand R Reprod Fertil. 2025; 6(1).

PMID: 39869096 PMC: 11825185. DOI: 10.1530/RAF-24-0097.


Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in patients of different age: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Adamyan L, Pivazyan L, Obosyan L, Krylova E, Isaeva S Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2024; 67(4):356-379.

PMID: 38803301 PMC: 11266849. DOI: 10.5468/ogs.24028.


Comparing Day 5 versus Day 6 euploid blastocyst in frozen embryo transfer and developing a predictive model for optimizing outcomes: a retrospective cohort study.

Yin B, Li S, Sun L, Yao Z, Cui Y, Zhang C Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024; 14:1302194.

PMID: 38239982 PMC: 10794779. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1302194.


The morphokinetic signature of human blastocysts with mosaicism and the clinical outcomes following transfer of embryos with low-level mosaicism.

Zou Y, Sui Y, Fu J, Ge N, Sun X, Sun Y J Ovarian Res. 2024; 17(1):10.

PMID: 38195558 PMC: 10775590. DOI: 10.1186/s13048-023-01324-w.


The importance of standardizing criteria for PGT-A interpretation of blastocysts analyzed by next-generation sequencing.

Bago A, Hernandez M, Villarreal P, Ortega C, Gutierrez A JBRA Assist Reprod. 2023; 27(3):453-462.

PMID: 37579264 PMC: 10712803. DOI: 10.5935/1518-0557.20230011.