Regeneration of Corneal Endothelium Following Complete Endothelial Cell Loss in Rat Keratoplasty

Overview

Journal Mol Vis

Specialties Cell Biology
Molecular Biology
Ophthalmology

Date 2010 Dec 9

PMID 21139971

Citations 11

Authors

J SCHWARTZKOPFF

L Bredow

S Mahlenbrey

D Boehringer

T Reinhard

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: Corneal endothelial cells (EC) are crucial for maintaining corneal clarity before and after keratoplasty. Since it is thought that corneal graft rejection leads to irreversible EC loss and transplant failure, we quantified immune mediated EC loss in the rat keratoplasty model and analyzed whether the EC layer would then regenerate.

Methods: Rats were subjected to orthotopic penetrating keratoplasty. We compared endothelial responses to immunological EC loss following allogeneic transplantations between Fisher and Lewis rats (group R) to those following mechanical EC removal in a syngeneic setting between Lewis rats (group S). Animals were followed clinically for corneal opacity for up to one year. Bulbi were excised and prepared for histological examination at different time points: ECs were defined and characterized using Alicarin red S/ DAPI staining on corneal flatmounts. Ki-67/ DAPI staining on flatmount preparations served to detect cell proliferation. Immunohistochemical staining of corneal cryosections was used to characterize infiltrating immune cells.

Results: GROUP R: After about two weeks the allografts were completely opaque, which was accompanied by a massive leukocyte infiltration in conjunction with EC destruction, signifying rejection. EC loss without an immune reaction (group S) resulted only in medium opacity levels. In both groups, all grafts regained clarity in the following weeks to months, and a newly-formed endothelial cell layer with irregular and enlarged ECs became apparent on the formerly EC free grafts. Scattered Ki-67 positive cells within the endothelial cell layer were observed during re-endothelialization. In addition to re-endothelialization, the immunological infiltration seen in the allografts at the time of rejection had subsided after one year.

Conclusions: Re-endothelialization following keratoplasty takes place in the rat in vivo and restores graft clarity, following both immunological or surgical destruction of ECs. Following rejection, EC replacement is accompanied by a reduction of immune infiltrates. Peripheral recipient ECs are a sufficient source for graft re-endothelialization, as seen in rats following EC removal. Our results suggest that ECs both proliferate and enlarge during re-endothelialization in the rat keratoplasty model.

Citing Articles

Corneal endothelial transplantation from bench to bedside: A review of animal models and their translational value for therapeutic development.

Chew L, Jun A, Barnett B Exp Eye Res. 2022; 224:109241.

PMID: 36075460 PMC: 10782848. DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2022.109241.

Corneal endothelial regeneration in human eyes using endothelium-free grafts.

Ying L, Qiu W, Wang B, Zhou P, Zhang B, Yao Y BMC Ophthalmol. 2022; 22(1):32.

PMID: 35062892 PMC: 8783470. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-022-02260-x.

Regenerative therapy for the Cornea.

Kumar A, Yun H, Funderburgh M, Du Y Prog Retin Eye Res. 2021; 87:101011.

PMID: 34530154 PMC: 8918435. DOI: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2021.101011.

Transcription Factor 4 Regulates the Regeneration of Corneal Endothelial Cells.

Hwang J, Yoon C, Hyon J, Chung T, Shin Y Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2020; 61(4):21.

PMID: 32301972 PMC: 7401711. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.61.4.21.

New ex vivo model of corneal endothelial phacoemulsification injury and rescue therapy with mesenchymal stromal cell secretome.

Rouhbakhshzaeri M, Rabiee B, Azar N, Ghahari E, Putra I, Eslani M J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018; 45(3):361-366.

PMID: 30527441 PMC: 6409103. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.09.030.

References

Williams K, Coster D . Penetrating corneal transplantation in the inbred rat: a new model. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1985; 26(1):23-30. View

Joyce N . Proliferative capacity of the corneal endothelium. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2003; 22(3):359-89. DOI: 10.1016/s1350-9462(02)00065-4. View

Mimura T, Joyce N . Replication competence and senescence in central and peripheral human corneal endothelium. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006; 47(4):1387-96. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.05-1199. View

Plskova J, Kuffova L, Holan V, Filipec M, Forrester J . Evaluation of corneal graft rejection in a mouse model. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002; 86(1):108-13. PMC: 1770977. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.86.1.108. View

Yamagami S, Yokoo S, Mimura T, Takato T, Araie M, Amano S . Distribution of precursors in human corneal stromal cells and endothelial cells. Ophthalmology. 2007; 114(3):433-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.07.042. View

Birnbaum F, Reinhard T, Bohringer D, Sundmacher R . Endothelial cell loss after autologous rotational keratoplasty. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2004; 243(1):57-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-004-0902-2. View

Gong N, Pleyer U, Ritter T, Knop E, Chen X . Corneal allograft endothelial cell replacement represents a reparative response to transplant injury. Mol Vis. 2009; 15:654-61. PMC: 2664843. View

Rose L, Kelliher C, Jun A . Endothelial keratoplasty: historical perspectives, current techniques, future directions. Can J Ophthalmol. 2009; 44(4):401-5. DOI: 10.3129/i09-090. View

Bourne W, Hodge D, Nelson L . Corneal endothelium five years after transplantation. Am J Ophthalmol. 1994; 118(2):185-96. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)72898-3. View

10.

Joyce N, Harris D, Zieske J . Mitotic inhibition of corneal endothelium in neonatal rats. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998; 39(13):2572-83. View

11.

Hori J, Streilein J . Dynamics of donor cell persistence and recipient cell replacement in orthotopic corneal allografts in mice. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001; 42(8):1820-8. View

12.

Gloor B, Gloor M, Marshall J, Meszaros J, DAICKER B . [Wound healing of the corneal posterior surface in animal experiments]. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1986; 188(3):225-30. DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1050617. View

13.

Gan L, Fagerholm P, Ekenbark S . Expression of proliferating cell nuclear antigen in corneas kept in long term culture. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1998; 76(3):308-13. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0420.1998.760311.x. View

14.

van Dooren B, Mulder P, Nieuwendaal C, Beekhuis W, Melles G . Endothelial cell density after posterior lamellar keratoplasty: five- to seven-year follow-up. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007; 144(3):471-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.05.015. View

15.

Engelmann K, Bednarz J, Bohnke M . [Endothelial cell transplantation and growth behavior of the human corneal endothelium]. Ophthalmologe. 1999; 96(9):555-62. DOI: 10.1007/s003470050452. View

16.

Birnbaum F, Schwartzkopff J, Scholz C, Reinhard T . Topical pimecrolimus does not prolong clear graft survival in a rat keratoplasty model. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007; 245(11):1717-21. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-007-0657-7. View

17.

Petroll W, Jester J, BEAN J, Cavanagh H . Labeling of cycling corneal endothelial cells during healing with a monoclonal antibody to the Ki67 antigen (MIB-1). Cornea. 1999; 18(1):98-108. View

18.

Joyce N . Cell cycle status in human corneal endothelium. Exp Eye Res. 2005; 81(6):629-38. DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2005.06.012. View

19.

Reinhard T, Bohringer D, Enczmann J, Kogler G, Wernet P, Bohringer S . HLA class I/II matching and chronic endothelial cell loss in penetrating normal risk keratoplasty. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2004; 82(1):13-8. DOI: 10.1046/j.1600-0420.2003.00188.x. View

20.

Ing J, Ing H, Nelson L, Hodge D, Bourne W . Ten-year postoperative results of penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 1998; 105(10):1855-65. DOI: 10.1016/S0161-6420(98)91030-2. View