» Articles » PMID: 21137089

Proteomic Analysis of Endoscopically (endoscopic Pancreatic Function Test) Collected Gastroduodenal Fluid Using In-gel Tryptic Digestion Followed by LC-MS/MS

Overview
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2010 Dec 8
PMID 21137089
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Proteomic analysis of gastroduodenal fluid offers an alternative strategy to study diseases, such as peptic ulcer disease and gastric cancer. We use in-gel tryptic digestion followed by LC-MS/MS (GeLC-MS/MS) to profile the proteome of gastroduodenal fluid collected during the endoscopic pancreatic function test (ePFT).

Experimental Design: Gastroduodenal fluid specimens collected during ePFT from six patients with upper abdominal pain were subjected to proteomic analysis. We extracted proteins using three chemical precipitation reagents (acetone, ethanol, and trichloroacetic acid) and analyzed each sample by SDS-PAGE and GeLC-MS/MS for protein identification. Cellular origin and molecular function of the identified proteins were determined via gene ontology analysis.

Results: All three precipitation techniques successfully extracted protein from gastroduodenal fluid, with acetone resulting in excellent resolution and minimal protein degradation compared with the other methods. A total of 134 unique proteins were found in our GeLC-MS/MS analysis of ePFT-collected gastroduodenal fluid samples. Sixty-seven proteins were identified in at least two of the three samples. Gene ontology analysis classified these proteins mainly as being peptidases and localized extracellularly.

Conclusions And Clinical Relevance: ePFT, followed by acetone precipitation, and coupled with LC-MS/MS, can be used to safely collect gastroduodenal fluid from the upper gastrointestinal tract for MS-based proteomic analysis.

Citing Articles

Quantitative proteomic analysis of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in West Highland white terriers with canine idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Maher R, Maatta M, Beynon R, Laurila H, McNamara P, Rajamaki M BMC Vet Res. 2022; 18(1):121.

PMID: 35354473 PMC: 8966175. DOI: 10.1186/s12917-022-03202-x.


Trefoil Factor Family (TFF) Peptides and Their Diverse Molecular Functions in Mucus Barrier Protection and More: Changing the Paradigm.

Hoffmann W Int J Mol Sci. 2020; 21(12).

PMID: 32630599 PMC: 7350206. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21124535.


Detection of digestive malignancies and post-gastrectomy complications via gastrointestinal fluid examination.

Huang L, Xu A Front Med. 2017; 11(1):20-31.

PMID: 28213880 DOI: 10.1007/s11684-016-0493-4.


Sample preparation for proteomic analysis using a GeLC-MS/MS strategy.

Paulo J J Biol Methods. 2016; 3(3).

PMID: 27482532 PMC: 4959781. DOI: 10.14440/jbm.2016.106.


Genomics, microRNA, epigenetics, and proteomics for future diagnosis, treatment and monitoring response in upper GI cancers.

Brucher B, Li Y, Schnabel P, Daumer M, Wallace T, Kube R Clin Transl Med. 2016; 5(1):13.

PMID: 27053248 PMC: 4823224. DOI: 10.1186/s40169-016-0093-6.


References
1.
Ryu J, Kim H, Lee Y, Myong N, Hwang C, Lee G . The proteomics approach to find biomarkers in gastric cancer. J Korean Med Sci. 2003; 18(4):505-9. PMC: 3055082. DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2003.18.4.505. View

2.
Karp N, Lilley K . Investigating sample pooling strategies for DIGE experiments to address biological variability. Proteomics. 2008; 9(2):388-97. DOI: 10.1002/pmic.200800485. View

3.
Schulz-Knappe P, Schrader M, Zucht H . The peptidomics concept. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen. 2006; 8(8):697-704. DOI: 10.2174/138620705774962418. View

4.
Issaq H, Xiao Z, Veenstra T . Serum and plasma proteomics. Chem Rev. 2007; 107(8):3601-20. DOI: 10.1021/cr068287r. View

5.
Diz A, Truebano M, Skibinski D . The consequences of sample pooling in proteomics: an empirical study. Electrophoresis. 2009; 30(17):2967-2975. DOI: 10.1002/elps.200900210. View