» Articles » PMID: 21136227

Perceived Weight Discrimination Amplifies the Link Between Central Adiposity and Nondiabetic Glycemic Control (HbA1c)

Overview
Journal Ann Behav Med
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 2010 Dec 8
PMID 21136227
Citations 37
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: While the preclinical development of type 2 diabetes is partly explained by obesity and central adiposity, psychosocial research has shown that chronic stressors such as discrimination have health consequences as well.

Purpose: We investigated the extent to which the well-established effects of obesity and central adiposity on nondiabetic glycemic control (indexed by HbA(1c)) were moderated by a targeted psychosocial stressor linked to weight: perceived weight discrimination.

Methods: The data came from the nondiabetic subsample (n = 938) of the Midlife in the United States (MIDUS II) survey.

Results: Body mass index (BMI), waist-to-hip ratio, and waist circumference were linked to significantly higher HbA(1c) (p < 0.001). Multivariate-adjusted models showed that weight discrimination exacerbated the effects of waist-to-hip ratio on HbA(1c) ( p < 0.05), such that people who had higher waist-to-hip ratios and reported weight discrimination had the highest HbA(1c) levels.

Conclusion: Understanding how biological and psychosocial factors interact at nondiabetic levels to increase vulnerability could have important implications for public health and education strategies. Effective strategies may include targeting sources of discrimination rather than solely targeting the health behaviors and practices of overweight and obese persons.

Citing Articles

Weight stigma and allostatic load in adults: protocol for a scoping review.

Cassiani-Miranda C, Diaz Rincon M, Arroyo-Gamero L, Giraldo-Barrios L, Carmona-Meza Z BMJ Open. 2024; 14(2):e076629.

PMID: 38367970 PMC: 10875553. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076629.


Maternal responsibility and omission of complexity: an exploration of the portrayal of gestational diabetes mellitus in Danish written media.

Eskildsen F, Davidsen E, Sorensen J, Nielsen K BMJ Open. 2024; 14(1):e079772.

PMID: 38296270 PMC: 10828855. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079772.


Moderation of associations between weight discrimination and diabetes status by psychosocial factors.

Finch L, Hawkley L, Schumm L, Iveniuk J, McClintock M, Huang E J Behav Med. 2023; 47(2):244-254.

PMID: 37946026 PMC: 11017919. DOI: 10.1007/s10865-023-00454-2.


Obesity Stigma: Causes, Consequences, and Potential Solutions.

Westbury S, Oyebode O, Van Rens T, Barber T Curr Obes Rep. 2023; 12(1):10-23.

PMID: 36781624 PMC: 9985585. DOI: 10.1007/s13679-023-00495-3.


Women's perceptions of weight stigma and experiences of weight-neutral treatment for binge eating disorder: A qualitative study.

Salvia M, Ritholz M, Craigen K, Quatromoni P EClinicalMedicine. 2023; 56:101811.

PMID: 36618893 PMC: 9816903. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101811.


References
1.
Norberg M, Stenlund H, Lindahl B, Andersson C, Eriksson J, Weinehall L . Work stress and low emotional support is associated with increased risk of future type 2 diabetes in women. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2006; 76(3):368-77. DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2006.09.002. View

2.
Glasgow R, Wagner E, Kaplan R, Vinicor F, Smith L, Norman J . If diabetes is a public health problem, why not treat it as one? A population-based approach to chronic illness. Ann Behav Med. 1999; 21(2):159-70. DOI: 10.1007/BF02908297. View

3.
Gerstein H . Glycosylated hemoglobin: finally ready for prime time as a cardiovascular risk factor. Ann Intern Med. 2004; 141(6):475-6. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-6-200409210-00014. View

4.
Amy N, Aalborg A, Lyons P, Keranen L . Barriers to routine gynecological cancer screening for White and African-American obese women. Int J Obes (Lond). 2005; 30(1):147-55. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803105. View

5.
Pereira M, Kartashov A, Ebbeling C, Van Horn L, Slattery M, Jacobs Jr D . Fast-food habits, weight gain, and insulin resistance (the CARDIA study): 15-year prospective analysis. Lancet. 2005; 365(9453):36-42. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17663-0. View