» Articles » PMID: 21131257

Retraining Moderately Impaired Stroke Survivors in Driving-related Visual Attention Skills

Overview
Date 2010 Dec 7
PMID 21131257
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Visual inattention is a major cause of road accidents and is a problem commonly experienced after stroke.

Purpose: This study investigated the effects of 2 training programs on performance in the Useful Field of View (UFOV), a validated test of driving-related visual attention skills.

Method: Data from 69 first-ever, moderately impaired stroke survivors who participated in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to determine the effects of simulator training on driving after stroke were analyzed. In addition to regular interventions at a rehabilitation center, participants received 15 hours of either simulator-based driving-related training or non-computer-based cognitive training over 5 weeks.

Results: Total percentage reduction in UFOV and performance in divided and selective attention and speed of processing subtests were documented at 6 to 9 weeks (pretraining), 11 to 15 weeks (posttraining), and 6 months post stroke (follow-up). Generalized estimating equation (GEE) model revealed neither group effects nor significant interaction effects of group with time in the UFOV total score and the 3 subtests. However, there were significant within-group improvements from pre- through posttraining to follow-up for all the UFOV parameters. Post-hoc GEE analysis revealed that most improvement in both groups occurred from pre- to posttraining.

Conclusion: Both training programs significantly improved visual attention skills of moderately impaired stroke survivors after 15 hours of training and retention of benefit lasted up to 6 months after stroke. Neither of the training programs was better than the other.

Citing Articles

Developing the Rationale for Including Virtual Reality in Cognitive Rehabilitation and Exercise Training Approaches for Managing Cognitive Dysfunction in MS.

Wender C, DeLuca J, Sandroff B NeuroSci. 2024; 3(2):200-213.

PMID: 39483364 PMC: 11523750. DOI: 10.3390/neurosci3020015.


Driving Rehabilitation for Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

Hwang S, Song C Healthcare (Basel). 2023; 11(11).

PMID: 37297777 PMC: 10252792. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11111637.


Efficacy of Multisensory Technology in Post-Stroke Cognitive Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review.

Parisi A, Bellinzona F, Di Lernia D, Repetto C, De Gaspari S, Brizzi G J Clin Med. 2022; 11(21).

PMID: 36362551 PMC: 9656411. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11216324.


Non-pharmacological interventions for spatial neglect or inattention following stroke and other non-progressive brain injury.

Longley V, Hazelton C, Heal C, Pollock A, Woodward-Nutt K, Mitchell C Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021; 7:CD003586.

PMID: 34196963 PMC: 8247630. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003586.pub4.


Cognitive rehabilitation for attention deficits following stroke.

Loetscher T, Potter K, Wong D, das Nair R Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019; 2019(11).

PMID: 31706263 PMC: 6953353. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002842.pub3.