» Articles » PMID: 21130320

Canine Substitution for Missing Maxillary Lateral Incisors: the Influence of Canine Morphology, Size, and Shade on Perceptions of Smile Attractiveness

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2010 Dec 7
PMID 21130320
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: This study was conducted to determine whether variations in the morphology, size, or shade of maxillary canines would influence perceptions of smile attractiveness in patients with canines substituted for missing maxillary lateral incisors.

Methods: A smiling photograph of a hypodontia patient who had had orthodontic space closure with maxillary canines replacing the lateral incisors was digitally modified to create a bilaterally symmetrical image. Four groups of images were created, digitally altering canine gingival height, crown tip height, canine width, and canine shade. Three groups of judges (40 orthodontists, 40 dentists, and 40 laypeople) ranked the images for smile attractiveness, also scoring the most and the least attractive of each of the 4 groups, and the most and least attractive of all images.

Results: Canine gingival height was the most attractive 0.5 mm below the gingival margin of the maxillary central incisor and progressively less attractive with increasing gingival height. Increasing canine width, increased canine tip height, and pointed canines were perceived to be unattractive. Brighter than normal shades of canines were preferred to darker shades. Narrow canine crowns were most frequently ranked as the most attractive overall, 1.5 mm narrower was preferred by the orthodontists and dentists, and 3.0 mm narrower was preferred by the laypeople. All 3 groups ranked the darkest image, 20 times darker than the original, most frequently as the least attractive image overall. There was good general agreement between orthodontists, dentists, and laypeople for all 4 parameters of smile attractiveness, although laypeople demonstrated greater intragroup variations.

Conclusions: The morphology, size, and shade of the maxillary canine in patients having orthodontic space closure and lateral incisor substitution can have a marked effect on perceived smile attractiveness.

Citing Articles

Congenitally Missing Lateral Incisors: Prioritizing Space Closure Whenever Feasible.

Khalil A, Alrehaili R, Almatrodi R, Koshak A, Tawakkul B, Almuqati T Cureus. 2024; 16(11):e74471.

PMID: 39726452 PMC: 11669918. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.74471.


Influence of gingival margin height variation on perceived aesthetics following absent maxillary lateral incisor-canine substitution.

Hershaw C, Seehra J, Johnson N, Slipper C, Papageorgiou S, Asimakopoulou K Eur J Orthod. 2024; 47(1).

PMID: 39656782 PMC: 11630025. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjae067.


Aesthetic assessment of maxillary lateral and canine implant-supported crowns by laypersons and orthodontists.

Sabel N, Toft E, Johansson E, Naoumova J Acta Odontol Scand. 2024; 83:362-370.

PMID: 38864178 PMC: 11302503. DOI: 10.2340/aos.v83.40738.


Conservative interdisciplinary management for a congenitally missing maxillary lateral incisor in an adolescent patient.

Hmud R, Ong D Aust Dent J. 2024; 69(4):267-277.

PMID: 38856304 PMC: 11845843. DOI: 10.1111/adj.13027.


Evaluation of the aesthetics and clinical findings in patients with missing maxillary lateral incisors treated with a 10-year interval.

Hedmo C, Lindsten R, Josefsson E Eur J Orthod. 2024; 46(3).

PMID: 38656537 PMC: 11041049. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjae018.