» Articles » PMID: 21125285

Posterior Cranial Vault Distraction Osteogenesis in Craniosynostosis: Estimated Increases in Intracranial Volume

Overview
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2010 Dec 3
PMID 21125285
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To study distraction osteogenesis of the posterior cranial vault in children requiring increased intracranial volume.

Materials And Methods: Ten patients were treated with cranial distractors. Five children had previously been operated for scaphocephaly and one child for Saether-Chotzen syndrome. Two patients had bilateral coronal suture synostosis with Muenke syndrome and two patients had Apert syndrome. At surgery, the cranial bones were mobilized, the head was widened during surgery, and the segments fixed to each other with distractors. Further expansion at a rate of 1 mm/day was performed over 2-4 weeks. The cranium was distracted posteriorly from 20 to 30 mm.

Results: The patients all tolerated surgery and distraction well. In all cases, the parents were able to perform the distraction at home. There were no technical problems with the distraction devices. Two cases had minor cutaneous problems, where the distractor penetrated the skin. These cases responded to gentle local wound care measures. At the time of distractor removal, ossification had occurred sufficiently in one of these two cases. In the other case, the device was removed and replaced with a resorbable plate, without any harmful effect on the result. In all cases, sufficient expansion was achieved without causing more cosmetic deformity. Ossification occurred in all cases. This method seems effective, as the calculated increase in intracranial volume was a mean of 20.2% (range 10.2-28.5%).

Conclusions: This preliminary series shows that cranial bone distraction is a useful method for cranial expansion with low morbidity in children with craniosynostosis.

Citing Articles

Experiences of surgical complications and reoperations in nonsyndromic sagittal synostosis patients in Oulu.

Svalina A, Serlo W, Sinikumpu J, Salokorpi N Childs Nerv Syst. 2024; 40(12):3983-3991.

PMID: 38940955 PMC: 11579183. DOI: 10.1007/s00381-024-06519-0.


Early posterior vault distraction osteogenesis changes the syndromic craniosynostosis treatment paradigm: long-term outcomes of a 23-year cohort study.

Wu M, Barnett S, Massenburg B, Ng J, Romeo D, Taylor J Childs Nerv Syst. 2024; 40(9):2811-2823.

PMID: 38904767 PMC: 11322207. DOI: 10.1007/s00381-024-06465-x.


Craniofacial Distraction Osteogenesis.

Burns H, Wang D, Abu-Ghname A, Dempsey R Semin Plast Surg. 2023; 37(4):253-264.

PMID: 38098686 PMC: 10718658. DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1776298.


Posterior cranial vault distraction in children with syndromic craniosynostosis: the era of biodegradable materials-a comprehensive review of the literature and proposed novel global application.

Fouda M, Seltzer L, Zappi K, Hoffman C, Pannullo S Childs Nerv Syst. 2023; 40(3):759-768.

PMID: 37966499 DOI: 10.1007/s00381-023-06221-7.


Management of Chiari 1 Malformation and Hydrocephalus in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Review.

Vankipuram S, Ellenbogen J, Sinha A J Pediatr Neurosci. 2022; 17(Suppl 1):S67-S76.

PMID: 36388008 PMC: 9648655. DOI: 10.4103/jpn.JPN_49_22.


References
1.
Blount J, Louis Jr R, Tubbs R, Grant J . Pansynostosis: a review. Childs Nerv Syst. 2007; 23(10):1103-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00381-007-0362-1. View

2.
Serlo W, Ashammakhi N, Lansman S, Tormala P, Waris T . A new technique for correction of trigonocephaly using bioabsorbable osteofixation tacks and plates and a novel tack-shooter. J Craniofac Surg. 2003; 14(1):92-6. DOI: 10.1097/00001665-200301000-00017. View

3.
Ilizarov G . The principles of the Ilizarov method. 1988. Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 1997; 56(1):49-53. View

4.
Serlo W, Kaarela O, Peltoniemi H, Merikanto J, Ashammakhi N, Lassila K . Use of self-reinforced polylactide osteosynthesis devices in craniofacial surgery: a long-term follow-up study. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2001; 35(3):285-92. DOI: 10.1080/028443101750523195. View

5.
Ilizarov G . Clinical application of the tension-stress effect for limb lengthening. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990; (250):8-26. View