» Articles » PMID: 21124152

The Role of Three-dimensional Scanning Technique in Evaluation of Breast Asymmetry in Breast Augmentation: a 100-case Study

Overview
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2010 Dec 3
PMID 21124152
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Three-dimensional scanning offers new opportunities to enable objective and quantitative analysis of the breast. The authors introduce an innovative method of performing a thorough analysis of breast asymmetry by means of three-dimensional scanning.

Methods: One hundred breast augmentation patients underwent preoperative three-dimensional scanning. The coordinate system was established and the three-dimensional breast model was analyzed using software. The discrepancies of nipple level, nipple to midline distance, inferior mammary fold level, breast width, breast projection, breast volume, and anterior chest wall projection were measured.

Results: The mean discrepancies of nipple level, nipple to midline distance, inferior mammary fold level, breast width, breast projection, and anterior chest wall projection were 4.9±3.7, 4.1±3.5, 4.7±3.5, 4.6±2.7, 5.4±4.1, and 4.4±2.9 mm, respectively. The mean discrepancy of breast volume was 48±42 ml. The incidence of significant asymmetry of nipple position was 72 percent. The incidence of significant asymmetry of the breast mound was 94 percent (patients with at least one parameter with significant asymmetry), and the incidence of asymmetric inferior mammary fold level, breast width, breast projection, and breast volume was 44, 46, 46, and 76 percent, respectively. The incidence of significant asymmetry of the anterior chest wall projection was 36 percent. None of the patients was completely free of asymmetry. Ninety-two percent had at least two parameters of asymmetry and 72 percent had at least three parameters of asymmetry.

Conclusions: A thorough evaluation of breast asymmetry can be carried out with the authors' innovative method. This study indicates that three-dimensional measurement of the breast will probably play an important role in implant selection to correct breast asymmetry.

Citing Articles

New Insights Into Breast and Chest Wall Asymmetry in the Aesthetic Patient.

Hafezi F, Kazemi Ashtiani A, Azarbakhsh M, Ali J, Gharegheshlagh S Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2024; 6:ojae080.

PMID: 39670218 PMC: 11635366. DOI: 10.1093/asjof/ojae080.


Secondary Revision after Breast Reconstruction with Free Abdominal Perforator Flap: Flap Liposuction and Inframammary Fold Reconstruction.

Okumura S, Maruyama Y, Nakamura R, Takanari K, Hyodo I, Iwata H Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024; 12(12):e6336.

PMID: 39640213 PMC: 11620721. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006336.


A qualitative study on the experiences of women undergoing surgery for developmental breast asymmetry.

Ho L, Jafari S, Crittenden T, van Essen P, Smallman A, Dean N Womens Health (Lond). 2024; 20:17455057241274901.

PMID: 39238214 PMC: 11378208. DOI: 10.1177/17455057241274901.


3D Analysis of Breast Morphological Changes after Vertical-Scar Reduction Mammoplasty: A Prospective Study.

Li H, Lin Y, Zhang X, Li Z, Mu D Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024; 48(19):3904-3913.

PMID: 38551709 DOI: 10.1007/s00266-024-03985-4.


Quantitative assessment of inframammary fold in Asians: an MRI study.

Wang D, Yi Y, Ren Y, Wu Y Gland Surg. 2023; 12(8):1067-1074.

PMID: 37701295 PMC: 10493628. DOI: 10.21037/gs-23-65.