» Articles » PMID: 21106056

Common and Distinct Organ and Stress Responsive Transcriptomic Patterns in Oryza Sativa and Arabidopsis Thaliana

Overview
Journal BMC Plant Biol
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Biology
Date 2010 Nov 26
PMID 21106056
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Arabidopsis thaliana is clearly established as the model plant species. Given the ever-growing demand for food, there is a need to translate the knowledge learned in Arabidopsis to agronomically important species, such as rice (Oryza sativa). To gain a comparative insight into the similarities and differences into how organs are built and how plants respond to stress, the transcriptomes of Arabidopsis and rice were compared at the level of gene orthology and functional categorisation.

Results: Organ specific transcripts in rice and Arabidopsis display less overlap in terms of gene orthology compared to the orthology observed between both genomes. Although greater overlap in terms of functional classification was observed between root specific transcripts in rice and Arabidopsis, this did not extend to flower, leaf or seed specific transcripts. In contrast, the overall abiotic stress response transcriptome displayed a significantly greater overlap in terms of gene orthology compared to the orthology observed between both genomes. However, ~50% or less of these orthologues responded in a similar manner in both species. In fact, under cold and heat treatments as many or more orthologous genes responded in an opposite manner or were unchanged in one species compared to the other. Examples of transcripts that responded oppositely include several genes encoding proteins involved in stress and redox responses and non-symbiotic hemoglobins that play central roles in stress signalling pathways. The differences observed in the abiotic transcriptomes were mirrored in the presence of cis-acting regulatory elements in the promoter regions of stress responsive genes and the transcription factors that potentially bind these regulatory elements. Thus, both the abiotic transcriptome and its regulation differ between rice and Arabidopsis.

Conclusions: These results reveal significant divergence between Arabidopsis and rice, in terms of the abiotic stress response and its regulation. Both plants are shown to employ unique combinations of genes to achieve growth and stress responses. Comparison of these networks provides a more rational approach to translational studies that is based on the response observed in these two diverse plant models.

Citing Articles

Comparative Transcriptomics of Multi-Stress Responses in and .

Dong Y, Gupta S, Wargent J, Putterill J, Macknight R, Gechev T Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(14).

PMID: 37511083 PMC: 10379395. DOI: 10.3390/ijms241411323.


Nitric Oxide and Globin Glb1 Regulate Infection of .

Terron-Camero L, Molina-Moya E, Pelaez-Vico M, Sandalio L, Romero-Puertas M Antioxidants (Basel). 2023; 12(7).

PMID: 37507861 PMC: 10376111. DOI: 10.3390/antiox12071321.


New Insights into rice pyrimidine catabolic enzymes.

Lopez A, Narvaez-Ortiz H, Rincon-Benavides M, Pulido D, Fuentes Suarez L, Zimmermann B Front Plant Sci. 2023; 14:1079778.

PMID: 36818891 PMC: 9930899. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1079778.


Comparative transcriptome analysis reveals the regulatory mechanisms of two tropical water lilies in response to cold stress.

Ma X, Jin Q, Wang Y, Wang X, Wang X, Yang M BMC Genomics. 2023; 24(1):82.

PMID: 36809964 PMC: 9945721. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-023-09176-w.


Physiological and transcriptome analysis of Poa pratensis var. anceps cv. Qinghai in response to cold stress.

Dong W, Ma X, Jiang H, Zhao C, Ma H BMC Plant Biol. 2020; 20(1):362.

PMID: 32736517 PMC: 7393922. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-020-02559-1.


References
1.
Narsai R, Ivanova A, Ng S, Whelan J . Defining reference genes in Oryza sativa using organ, development, biotic and abiotic transcriptome datasets. BMC Plant Biol. 2010; 10:56. PMC: 2923530. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2229-10-56. View

2.
Finkler A, Kaplan B, Fromm H . Ca-Responsive cis-Elements in Plants. Plant Signal Behav. 2009; 2(1):17-9. PMC: 2633890. DOI: 10.4161/psb.2.1.3611. View

3.
Howell K, Narsai R, Carroll A, Ivanova A, Lohse M, Usadel B . Mapping metabolic and transcript temporal switches during germination in rice highlights specific transcription factors and the role of RNA instability in the germination process. Plant Physiol. 2008; 149(2):961-80. PMC: 2633829. DOI: 10.1104/pp.108.129874. View

4.
Ruckle M, DeMarco S, Larkin R . Plastid signals remodel light signaling networks and are essential for efficient chloroplast biogenesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2007; 19(12):3944-60. PMC: 2217644. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.107.054312. View

5.
Godfray H, Beddington J, Crute I, Haddad L, Lawrence D, Muir J . Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science. 2010; 327(5967):812-8. DOI: 10.1126/science.1185383. View