» Articles » PMID: 21104106

Development and Application of Co-culture for Ethanol Production by Co-fermentation of Glucose and Xylose: a Systematic Review

Overview
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2010 Nov 25
PMID 21104106
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This article reviews current co-culture systems for fermenting mixtures of glucose and xylose to ethanol. Thirty-five co-culture systems that ferment either synthetic glucose and xylose mixture or various biomass hydrolysates are examined. Strain combinations, fermentation modes and conditions, and fermentation performance for these co-culture systems are compared and discussed. It is noted that the combination of Pichia stipitis with Saccharomyces cerevisiae or its respiratory-deficient mutant is most commonly used. One of the best results for fermentation of glucose and xylose mixture is achieved by using co-culture of immobilized Zymomonas mobilis and free cells of P. stipitis, giving volumetric ethanol production of 1.277 g/l/h and ethanol yield of 0.49-0.50 g/g. The review discloses that, as a strategy for efficient conversion of glucose and xylose, co-culture fermentation for ethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass can increase ethanol yield and production rate, shorten fermentation time, and reduce process costs, and it is a promising technology although immature.

Citing Articles

Caproate production from Enset fiber in one-pot two-step fermentation using anaerobic fungi (Neocallimastix cameroonii strain G341) and Clostridium kluyveri DSM 555.

Seid N, Ochsenreither K, Neumann A Microb Cell Fact. 2023; 22(1):216.

PMID: 37864174 PMC: 10588050. DOI: 10.1186/s12934-023-02224-w.


Production of Phenylacetylcarbinol via Biotransformation Using the Co-Culture of TISTR 5306 and TISTR 5606 as the Biocatalyst.

Kumar A, Techapun C, Sommanee S, Mahakuntha C, Feng J, Htike S J Fungi (Basel). 2023; 9(9).

PMID: 37755036 PMC: 10533076. DOI: 10.3390/jof9090928.


Exploring the Potential of Lactic Acid Fermentation for the Recovery of Exhausted Vanilla Beans.

Hadj Saadoun J, Levante A, Ferrillo A, Trapani F, Bernini V, Galaverna G Front Nutr. 2022; 9:858716.

PMID: 35662951 PMC: 9161551. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.858716.


A Comparative Study of Various Pretreatment Approaches for Bio-Ethanol Production from Willow Sawdust, Using Co-Cultures and Mono-Cultures of Different Yeast Strains.

Ben Atitallah I, Antonopoulou G, Ntaikou I, Soto Beobide A, Dracopoulos V, Mechichi T Molecules. 2022; 27(4).

PMID: 35209130 PMC: 8875012. DOI: 10.3390/molecules27041344.


Over-feeding the gut microbiome: A scoping review on health implications and therapeutic perspectives.

Barone M, DAmico F, Fabbrini M, Rampelli S, Brigidi P, Turroni S World J Gastroenterol. 2021; 27(41):7041-7064.

PMID: 34887627 PMC: 8613651. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i41.7041.


References
1.
Gong C, Cao N, Du J, Tsao G . Ethanol production from renewable resources. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. 1999; 65:207-41. DOI: 10.1007/3-540-49194-5_9. View

2.
Zhou , INGRAM . Engineering endoglucanase-secreting strains of ethanologenic Klebsiella oxytoca P2. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 1999; 22(6):600-607. DOI: 10.1038/sj.jim.2900666. View

3.
Olsson L, Hahn-Hagerdal B, Zacchi G . Kinetics of ethanol production by recombinant Escherichia coli KO11. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1995; 45(4):356-65. DOI: 10.1002/bit.260450410. View

4.
Zaldivar J, Nielsen J, Olsson L . Fuel ethanol production from lignocellulose: a challenge for metabolic engineering and process integration. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2001; 56(1-2):17-34. DOI: 10.1007/s002530100624. View

5.
Bothast R, Nichols N, Dien B . Fermentations with new recombinant organisms. Biotechnol Prog. 1999; 15(5):867-75. DOI: 10.1021/bp990087w. View