» Articles » PMID: 21094942

Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Parental Bonding Instrument

Overview
Journal Int J Nurs Stud
Specialty Nursing
Date 2010 Nov 25
PMID 21094942
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The Parental Bonding Instrument (PBI) is a widely used assessment tool for measuring parental characteristics that affect parent-child bonds. The measure was developed for and has been most administered in Western populations. Psychometric analyses have yielded discrepant results as to whether the PBI is best represented by a two-factor model (care and overprotection) or a three-factor model (care, overprotection, and autonomy).

Objectives: Little is known about how the PBI performs in Chinese samples, and there is limited data from Eastern populations as a whole. The purpose of this study is to: (1) explore the data and identify the underlying structural model that best fits the Chinese culture, and (2) to further compare the factor structure that emerges in a Chinese sample with that which has emerged in other Eastern cultures (i.e., Japanese) and Western countries.

Methods: The present study investigated the psychometric properties of a Chinese translation of the PBI among a sample (N=1417) of mothers of kindergarten children. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to identify the most adequate model.

Results: Results supported a four-factor model that included an indifference factor (χ(2)/df<3.0; RMSEA<0.06; SRMR<0.08). Both the two-factor and three-factor models performed poorly (χ(2)/df>5.0; RMSEA>0.08; SRMR>1.0; CFI<0.90 for both). In this sample, use of a Chinese translated version of the PBI was successful. Support for the four-factor model is consistent with findings from previous studies of Eastern populations and discrepant from those among Western samples.

Conclusions: The indifference factor may reflect aspects of parenting specific to Eastern cultures, which tend to value group cohesion over individualization and independence. More research is needed to determine whether these findings are generalizable to all Eastern countries and whether aspects of Chinese culture (e.g., the single-child law) produce unique effects that may impact PBI administration in China.

Citing Articles

Relationship between parenting stress and behavioral and emotional problems in preschool children: A mediation effect analysis.

Fu Z, Li Y, Yu R, Guo R, Gao L, Zhao S World J Psychiatry. 2025; 15(1):100068.

PMID: 39831023 PMC: 11684228. DOI: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i1.100068.


Longitudinal Relationships among Parenting, Prosocial Behaviors, and Emotional Problems: Examining Between- and Within-Person Associations in Adolescents.

Liu Q, Wang Z J Youth Adolesc. 2024; 53(11):2669-2682.

PMID: 39095671 DOI: 10.1007/s10964-024-02056-w.


A Cross-Sectional Study: Structural and Related Functional Connectivity Changes in the Brain: Stigmata of Adverse Parenting in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder?.

Nie Z, Xie X, Kang L, Wang W, Xu S, Chen M Brain Sci. 2023; 13(4).

PMID: 37190659 PMC: 10136887. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13040694.


The Relationship Between Parenting Styles Practiced By Grandparents And Children's Emotional And Behavioral Problems.

Li Y, Cui N, Kok H, Deatrick J, Liu J J Child Fam Stud. 2023; 28(7):1899-1913.

PMID: 37006465 PMC: 10065465. DOI: 10.1007/s10826-019-01415-7.


Parental Attitudes, Intentions, Decisions, and Psychological Wellbeing Regarding COVID-19 Vaccination: Preschool, School-Age, and Adolescent Caregivers.

Wang L, Kou K, Tang K, Lee Y, Chen Y, Lo M Vaccines (Basel). 2022; 10(12).

PMID: 36560524 PMC: 9782239. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10122114.


References
1.
Rees C . Thinking about children's attachments. Arch Dis Child. 2005; 90(10):1058-65. PMC: 1720124. DOI: 10.1136/adc.2004.068650. View

2.
Bentler P . Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull. 1990; 107(2):238-46. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238. View

3.
Parker G, Johnston P, Hayward L . Prediction of schizophrenic relapse using the parental bonding instrument. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 1988; 22(3):283-92. DOI: 10.3109/00048678809161209. View

4.
Qadir F, Stewart R, Khan M, Prince M . The validity of the Parental Bonding Instrument as a measure of maternal bonding among young Pakistani women. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2005; 40(4):276-82. DOI: 10.1007/s00127-005-0887-0. View

5.
Parker G . The Parental Bonding Instrument. A decade of research. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1990; 25(6):281-2. DOI: 10.1007/BF00782881. View