» Articles » PMID: 2108749

Prevalence of Vertebral Compression Fractures Due to Osteoporosis in Ankylosing Spondylitis

Overview
Journal BMJ
Specialty General Medicine
Date 1990 Mar 3
PMID 2108749
Citations 40
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To determine the prevalence of vertebral compression fractures due to osteoporosis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.

Design: Prospective study of 111 consecutive patients; patients with vertebral compression fractures were entered into a case-control study.

Setting: Outpatient clinic at the centre for rheumatic diseases, Glasgow.

Patients: 111 Consecutive patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Patients with compression fractures were matched for age and sex with two controls selected from the rest of the group. Patients with biconcave vertebral fractures were also studied.

Main Outcome Measures: Assessments of spinal deformity and mobility and analysis of lateral radiographs of spines for presence of syndesmophytes.

Results: Fifteen patients with compression fractures and five with biconcave fractures were studied. Compared with the controls the patients with compression fractures had increased formation of syndesmophytes in the lumbar spine, whereas those with biconcave fractures had increased formation throughout the spine. Patients with compression fractures also had a greater degree of spinal deformity (distance from wall to tragus 24.5 cm v 12.7 cm in controls), less spinal mobility (20 v 45.6 degrees of flexion), and reduced chest expansion (2 cm v 3cm).

Conclusion: Vertebral compression fractures due to osteoporosis are a common but frequently unrecognised complication of ankylosing spondylitis and may contribute to the pathogenesis of spinal deformity and back pain.

Citing Articles

Review of the updated definitions and concepts of spinal lesions in axial spondyloarthritis.

Massignan A, Knabben M, da Silva T, Hohgraefe Neto G Skeletal Radiol. 2024; .

PMID: 39382623 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-024-04812-2.


The prevalence of vertebral fractures in diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis and ankylosing spondylitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Harlianto N, Ezzafzafi S, Foppen W, Kuperus J, van der Horst-Bruinsma I, de Jong P N Am Spine Soc J. 2024; 17:100312.

PMID: 38370336 PMC: 10869944. DOI: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100312.


Bone density and fracture risk factors in ankylosing spondylitis: a meta-analysis.

Yan F, Wu L, Lang J, Huang Z Osteoporos Int. 2023; 35(1):25-40.

PMID: 37814094 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-023-06925-1.


Application of vertebral body compression osteotomy in pedicle subtraction osteotomy on ankylosing spondylitis kyphosis: Finite element analysis and retrospective study.

Yang C, Zeng Z, Yan H, Wu J, Lv X, Zhang D Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023; 14:1131880.

PMID: 37033224 PMC: 10076869. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1131880.


Occurrence and relative risks for non-vertebral fractures in patients with ankylosing spondylitis compared with the general population: a register-based study from Sweden.

Bengtsson K, Askling J, Lorentzon M, Rosengren B, Deminger A, Klingberg E RMD Open. 2023; 9(1).

PMID: 36787924 PMC: 9930563. DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002753.


References
1.
HURXTHAL L . Measurement of anterior vertebral compressions and biconcave vertebrae. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1968; 103(3):635-44. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.103.3.635. View

2.
Macrae I, Haslock D, WRIGHT V . Grading of films for sacro-iliitis in population studies. Ann Rheum Dis. 1971; 30(1):58-66. PMC: 1005726. DOI: 10.1136/ard.30.1.58. View

3.
Spencer D, Park W, Dick H, Papazoglou S, BUCHANAN W . Radiological manifestations in 200 patients with ankylosing spondylitis: correlation with clinical features and HLA B27. J Rheumatol. 1979; 6(3):305-15. View

4.
Hunter T, Dubo H . Spinal fractures complicating ankylosing spondylitis. A long-term followup study. Arthritis Rheum. 1983; 26(6):751-9. DOI: 10.1002/art.1780260608. View

5.
Reid D, Nicoll J, Kennedy N, Smith M, Tothill P, Nuki G . Bone mass in ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol. 1986; 13(5):932-5. View