» Articles » PMID: 21085668

Quantitative Assessment of the Sensitivity of Various Commercial Reverse Transcriptases Based on Armored HIV RNA

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2010 Nov 19
PMID 21085668
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The in-vitro reverse transcription of RNA to its complementary DNA, catalyzed by the enzyme reverse transcriptase, is the most fundamental step in the quantitative RNA detection in genomic studies. As such, this step should be as analytically sensitive, efficient and reproducible as possible, especially when dealing with degraded or low copy RNA samples. While there are many reverse transcriptases in the market, all claiming to be highly sensitive, there is need for a systematic independent comparison of their applicability in quantification of rare RNA transcripts or low copy RNA, such as those obtained from archival tissues.

Methodology/principal Findings: We performed RT-qPCR to assess the sensitivity and reproducibility of 11 commercially available reverse transcriptases in cDNA synthesis from low copy number RNA levels. As target RNA, we used a serially known number of Armored HIV RNA molecules, and observed that 9 enzymes we tested were consistently sensitive to ∼1,000 copies, seven of which were sensitive to ∼100 copies, while only 5 were sensitive to ∼10 RNA template copies across all replicates tested. Despite their demonstrated sensitivity, these five best performing enzymes (Accuscript, HIV-RT, M-MLV, Superscript III and Thermoscript) showed considerable variation in their reproducibility as well as their overall amplification efficiency. Accuscript and Superscript III were the most sensitive and consistent within runs, with Accuscript and Superscript II ranking as the most reproducible enzymes between assays.

Conclusions/significance: We therefore recommend the use of Accuscript or Superscript III when dealing with low copy number RNA levels, and suggest purification of the RT reactions prior to downstream applications (eg qPCR) to augment detection. Although the results presented in this study were based on a viral RNA surrogate, and applied to nucleic acid lysates derived from archival formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tissue, their relative performance on RNA obtained from other tissue types may vary, and needs future evaluation.

Citing Articles

Gene Expression Profiling of FFPE Samples: A Titration Test.

Manjunath H, Al Khulaifi M, Sidahmed H, Ammar A, Vadakekolathu J, Rutella S Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2022; 21:15330338221129710.

PMID: 36415121 PMC: 9706083. DOI: 10.1177/15330338221129710.


Tutorial: Guidelines for Single-Cell RT-qPCR.

Zucha D, Kubista M, Valihrach L Cells. 2021; 10(10).

PMID: 34685587 PMC: 8534298. DOI: 10.3390/cells10102607.


Discovery and evolution of RNA and XNA reverse transcriptase function and fidelity.

Houlihan G, Arangundy-Franklin S, Porebski B, Subramanian N, Taylor A, Holliger P Nat Chem. 2020; 12(8):683-690.

PMID: 32690899 PMC: 7116287. DOI: 10.1038/s41557-020-0502-8.


End-stage renal disease reduces the expression of drug-metabolizing cytochrome P450s.

Deri M, Kiss A, Toth K, Paulik J, Sarvary E, Kobori L Pharmacol Rep. 2020; 72(6):1695-1705.

PMID: 32638224 PMC: 7704481. DOI: 10.1007/s43440-020-00127-w.


Random-sequence genetic oligomer pools display an innate potential for ligation and recombination.

Mutschler H, Taylor A, Porebski B, Lightowlers A, Houlihan G, Abramov M Elife. 2018; 7.

PMID: 30461419 PMC: 6289569. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.43022.


References
1.
Bustin S . Absolute quantification of mRNA using real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assays. J Mol Endocrinol. 2000; 25(2):169-93. DOI: 10.1677/jme.0.0250169. View

2.
McKinney M, Moon S, Kulesh D, Larsen T, Schoepp R . Detection of viral RNA from paraffin-embedded tissues after prolonged formalin fixation. J Clin Virol. 2008; 44(1):39-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2008.09.003. View

3.
Okello J, Zurek J, Devault A, Kuch M, Okwi A, Sewankambo N . Comparison of methods in the recovery of nucleic acids from archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded autopsy tissues. Anal Biochem. 2010; 400(1):110-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2010.01.014. View

4.
Gal A, Carnwath J, Dinnyes A, Herrmann D, Niemann H, Wrenzycki C . Comparison of real-time polymerase chain reaction and end-point polymerase chain reaction for the analysis of gene expression in preimplantation embryos. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2006; 18(3):365-71. DOI: 10.1071/rd05012. View

5.
Suslov O, Steindler D . PCR inhibition by reverse transcriptase leads to an overestimation of amplification efficiency. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005; 33(20):e181. PMC: 1298932. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gni176. View