» Articles » PMID: 21084417

Validation of Computational Fluid Dynamics in CT-based Airway Models with SPECT/CT

Overview
Journal Radiology
Specialty Radiology
Date 2010 Nov 19
PMID 21084417
Citations 82
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To compare the results obtained by using numerical flow simulations with the results of combined single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and computed tomography (CT) and to demonstrate the importance of correct boundary conditions for the numerical methods to account for the large amount of interpatient variability in airway geometry.

Materials And Methods: This study was approved by all relevant institutional review boards. All patients gave their signed informed consent. In this study, six patients with mild asthma (three men; three women; overall mean age, 46 years ± 17 [standard deviation]) underwent CT at functional residual capacity and total lung capacity, as well as SPECT/CT. CT data were used for segmentation and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. A comparison was made between airflow distribution, as derived with (a) SPECT/CT through tracer concentration analysis, (b) CT through lobar expansion measurement, and (c) CFD through flow computer simulation. Also, the heterogeneity of the ventilation was examined.

Results: Good agreement was found between SPECT/CT, CT, and CFD in terms of airflow distribution and hot spot detection. The average difference for the internal airflow distribution was less than 3% for CFD and CT versus SPECT/CT. Heterogeneity in ventilation patterns could be detected with SPECT/CT and CFD.

Conclusion: This results of this study show that patient-specific computer simulations with appropriate boundary conditions yield information that is similar to that obtained with functional imaging tools, such as SPECT/CT.

Supplemental Material: http://radiology.rsna.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1148/radiol.10100322/-/DC1.

Citing Articles

Regulatory and Industry Perspective on the Model Master File Framework for Locally Acting Drug Products.

Walenga R, Alam K, Clarke J, De Backer J, Friden M, Hamadeh A Pharm Res. 2025; .

PMID: 40011371 DOI: 10.1007/s11095-025-03823-5.


Subject-Specific Multi-Scale Modeling of the Fate of Inhaled Aerosols.

Kuprat A, Feng Y, Corley R, Darquenne C J Aerosol Sci. 2024; 183.

PMID: 39678160 PMC: 11636312. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2024.106471.


Non-local impact of distal airway constrictions on patterns of inhaled particle deposition.

Shemilt J, Horsley A, Wild J, Jensen O, Thompson A, Whitfield C R Soc Open Sci. 2024; 11(11):241108.

PMID: 39508002 PMC: 11539137. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.241108.


Rapid deposition analysis of inhaled aerosols in human airways.

Sadafi H, De Backer W, Krestin G, De Backer J Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):24965.

PMID: 39443597 PMC: 11499711. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-75578-9.


Modeling Realistic Geometries in Human Intrathoracic Airways.

Pennati F, Aliboni L, Aliverti A Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(17).

PMID: 39272764 PMC: 11393895. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14171979.