» Articles » PMID: 21081965

Population Structure and Genetic Differentiation Associated with Breeding History and Selection in Tomato (Solanum Lycopersicum L.)

Overview
Specialty Genetics
Date 2010 Nov 18
PMID 21081965
Citations 32
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) has undergone intensive selection during and following domestication. We investigated population structure and genetic differentiation within a collection of 70 tomato lines representing contemporary (processing and fresh-market) varieties, vintage varieties and landraces. The model-based Bayesian clustering software, STRUCTURE, was used to detect subpopulations. Six independent analyses were conducted using all marker data (173 markers) and five subsets of markers based on marker type (single-nucleotide polymorphisms, simple sequence repeats and insertion/deletions) and location (exon and intron sequences) within genes. All of these analyses consistently separated four groups predefined by market niche and age into distinct subpopulations. Furthermore, we detected at least two subpopulations within the processing varieties. These subpopulations correspond to historical patterns of breeding conducted for specific production environments. We found no subpopulation within fresh-market varieties, vintage varieties and landraces when using all marker data. High levels of admixture were shown in several varieties representing a transition in the demarcation between processing and fresh-market breeding. The genetic clustering detected by using the STRUCTURE software was confirmed by two statistics, pairwise F(st) (θ) and Nei's standard genetic distance. We also identified a total of 19 loci under positive selection between processing, fresh-market and vintage germplasm by using an F(st)-outlier method based on the deviation from the expected distribution of F(st) and heterozygosity. The markers and genome locations we identified are consistent with known patterns of selection and linkage to traits that differentiate the market classes. These results demonstrate how human selection through breeding has shaped genetic variation within cultivated tomato.

Citing Articles

The Jan Sjödin faba bean mutant collection: morphological and molecular characterization.

Khazaei H, Carlson-Nilsson U, Schulman A Hereditas. 2024; 161(1):37.

PMID: 39375815 PMC: 11457391. DOI: 10.1186/s41065-024-00339-7.


Limited genetic diversity found among genotypes of the Entada landrace (, (Welw.) Chessman) from Ethiopia.

Haile A, Kovi M, Johnsen S, Hvoslef-Eide T, Tesfaye B, Rognli O Front Plant Sci. 2024; 15:1336461.

PMID: 39315368 PMC: 11416936. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1336461.


Atlas of phenotypic, genotypic and geographical diversity present in the European traditional tomato.

Pons C, Casals J, Palombieri S, Fontanet L, Riccini A, Rambla J Hortic Res. 2022; 9:uhac112.

PMID: 35795386 PMC: 9252105. DOI: 10.1093/hr/uhac112.


European traditional tomatoes galore: a result of farmers' selection of a few diversity-rich loci.

Blanca J, Pons C, Montero-Pau J, Sanchez-Matarredona D, Ziarsolo P, Fontanet L J Exp Bot. 2022; 73(11):3431-3445.

PMID: 35358313 PMC: 9162183. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erac072.


Breeding for Resistance to Fusarium Wilt of Tomato: A Review.

Chitwood-Brown J, Vallad G, Lee T, Hutton S Genes (Basel). 2021; 12(11).

PMID: 34828278 PMC: 8624629. DOI: 10.3390/genes12111673.


References
1.
Pnueli L, Carmel-Goren L, Hareven D, Gutfinger T, Alvarez J, Ganal M . The SELF-PRUNING gene of tomato regulates vegetative to reproductive switching of sympodial meristems and is the ortholog of CEN and TFL1. Development. 1998; 125(11):1979-89. DOI: 10.1242/dev.125.11.1979. View

2.
Wang R, Stec A, Hey J, Lukens L, Doebley J . The limits of selection during maize domestication. Nature. 1999; 398(6724):236-9. DOI: 10.1038/18435. View

3.
Nei M . Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics. 1978; 89(3):583-90. PMC: 1213855. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/89.3.583. View

4.
Hurlbert S . The Nonconcept of Species Diversity: A Critique and Alternative Parameters. Ecology. 2017; 52(4):577-586. DOI: 10.2307/1934145. View

5.
Lee S, Walker D, Cregan P, Boerma H . Comparison of four flow cytometric SNP detection assays and their use in plant improvement. Theor Appl Genet. 2004; 110(1):167-74. DOI: 10.1007/s00122-004-1827-1. View