» Articles » PMID: 2107855

Microhaematuria in General Practice: is Urine Microscopy Misleading?

Overview
Journal Br J Gen Pract
Specialty Public Health
Date 1990 Feb 1
PMID 2107855
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

During a health centre screening programme for men aged 60 years and over, the urinary dipstick results of 58 patients found to have microscopic haematuria were compared with the results of immediate microscopy at the health centre and routine microscopy by a hospital laboratory. There was agreement between a positive dipstick test for haematuria and the presence of red cells at routine microscopy reported by the hospital laboratory in only 18 cases (31%). Routine urine microscopy results requested from general practice should not be taken as the criterion for deciding whether further investigation is needed in cases of microscopic haematuria.

Citing Articles

Phase contrast microscopic examination of urinary erythrocytes to localise source of bleeding: an overlooked technique?.

Mohammad K, Bdesha A, Snell M, Witherow R, Coleman D J Clin Pathol. 1993; 46(7):642-5.

PMID: 8157752 PMC: 501394. DOI: 10.1136/jcp.46.7.642.

References
1.
FRENI S . Microhematuria found by mass screening of apparently healthy males. Acta Cytol. 1977; 21(3):421-3. View

2.
Golin A, Howard R . Asymptomatic microscopic hematuria. J Urol. 1980; 124(3):389-91. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)55461-0. View

3.
Mariani A, Luangphinith S, Loo S, Scottolini A, Hodges C . Dipstick chemical urinalysis: an accurate cost-effective screening test. J Urol. 1984; 132(1):64-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)49465-1. View

4.
Bullock N . Asymptomatic microscopic haematuria. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986; 292(6521):645. PMC: 1339636. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.292.6521.645. View

5.
Britton J, Dowell A, Whelan P . Dipstick haematuria and bladder cancer in men over 60: results of a community study. BMJ. 1989; 299(6706):1010-2. PMC: 1837876. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.299.6706.1010. View