» Articles » PMID: 21076195

Effect of Organ Size and Position on Out-of-field Dose Distributions During Radiation Therapy

Overview
Journal Phys Med Biol
Publisher IOP Publishing
Date 2010 Nov 16
PMID 21076195
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Mantle field irradiation has historically been the standard radiation treatment for Hodgkin lymphoma. It involves treating large regions of the chest and neck with high doses of radiation (up to 30 Gy). Previous epidemiological studies on the incidence of second malignancies following radiation therapy for Hodgkin lymphoma have revealed an increased incidence of second tumors in various organs, including lung, breast, thyroid and digestive tract. Multiple other studies, including the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results, indicated an increased incidence in digestive tract including stomach cancers following mantle field radiotherapy. Assessment of stomach dose is challenging because the stomach is outside the treatment field but very near the treatment border where there are steep dose gradients. In addition, the stomach can vary greatly in size and position. We sought to evaluate the dosimetric impact of the size and variable position of the stomach relative to the field border for a typical Hodgkin lymphoma mantle field irradiation. The mean stomach dose was measured using thermoluminescent dosimetry for nine variations in stomach size and position. The mean doses to the nine stomach variations ranged from 0.43 to 0.83 Gy when 30 Gy was delivered to the treatment isocenter. Statistical analyses indicated that there were no significant differences in the mean stomach dose when the stomach was symmetrically expanded up to 3 cm or shifted laterally (medial, anterior or posterior shifts) by up to 3 cm. There was, however, a significant (P > 0.01) difference in the mean dose when the stomach was shifted superiorly or inferiorly by ≥2.5 cm.

Citing Articles

Prediction of the location and size of the stomach using patient characteristics for retrospective radiation dose estimation following radiotherapy.

Lamart S, Imran R, Simon S, Doi K, Morton L, Curtis R Phys Med Biol. 2013; 58(24):8739-53.

PMID: 24301086 PMC: 4160803. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/24/8739.


Analytical model for out-of-field dose in photon craniospinal irradiation.

Taddei P, Jalbout W, Howell R, Khater N, Geara F, Homann K Phys Med Biol. 2013; 58(21):7463-79.

PMID: 24099782 PMC: 4395760. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/21/7463.


Accuracy of out-of-field dose calculations by a commercial treatment planning system.

Howell R, Scarboro S, Kry S, Yaldo D Phys Med Biol. 2010; 55(23):6999-7008.

PMID: 21076191 PMC: 3152254. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/23/S03.

References
1.
Stovall M, Blackwell C, Cundiff J, Novack D, Palta J, Wagner L . Fetal dose from radiotherapy with photon beams: report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 36. Med Phys. 1995; 22(1):63-82. DOI: 10.1118/1.597525. View

2.
KIRBY T, Hanson W, Gastorf R, Chu C, SHALEK R . Mailable TLD system for photon and electron therapy beams. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1986; 12(2):261-5. DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(86)90107-0. View

3.
Bassal M, Mertens A, Taylor L, Neglia J, Greffe B, Hammond S . Risk of selected subsequent carcinomas in survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24(3):476-83. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.7235. View

4.
Weber D, Peguret N, Dipasquale G, Cozzi L . Involved-node and involved-field volumetric modulated arc vs. fixed beam intensity-modulated radiotherapy for female patients with early-stage supra-diaphragmatic Hodgkin lymphoma: a comparative planning study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009; 75(5):1578-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.05.012. View

5.
Ron E . Cancer risks from medical radiation. Health Phys. 2003; 85(1):47-59. DOI: 10.1097/00004032-200307000-00011. View