» Articles » PMID: 21072222

Marginal Bony Changes in Relation to Different Vertical Positions of Dental Implants

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2010 Nov 13
PMID 21072222
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to radiographically evaluate marginal bony changes in relation to different vertical positions of dental implants.

Methods: Two hundred implants placed in 107 patients were examined. The implants were classified by the vertical positions of the fixture-abutment connection (microgap): 'bone level,' 'above bone level,' or 'below bone level.' Marginal bone levels were examined in the radiographs taken immediately after fixture insertion, immediately after second-stage surgery, 6 months after prosthesis insertion, and 1 year after prosthesis insertion. Radiographic evaluation was carried out by measuring the distance between the microgap and the most coronal bone-to-implant contact (BIC).

Results: Immediately after fixture insertion, the distance between the microgap and most coronal BIC was 0.06 ± 0.68 mm; at second surgery, 0.43 ± 0.83 mm; 6 months after loading, 1.36 ± 0.56 mm; and 1 year after loading, 1.53 ± 0.51 mm (mean ± SD). All bony changes were statistically significant but the difference between the second surgery and the 6-month loading was greater than between other periods. In the 'below bone level' group, the marginal bony change between fixture insertion and 1 year after loading was about 2.25 mm, and in the 'bone level' group, 1.47 mm, and in 'above bone level' group, 0.89 mm. Therefore, the marginal bony change was smaller than other groups in the 'above bone level' group and larger than other groups in the 'below bone level' group.

Conclusions: Our results demonstrated that marginal bony changes occur during the early phase of healing after implant placement. These changes are dependent on the vertical positions of implants.

Citing Articles

Marginal bone loss around crestal or subcrestal dental implants: prospective clinical study.

Sargolzaie N, Zarch H, Arab H, Koohestani T, Ramandi M J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022; 48(3):159-166.

PMID: 35770357 PMC: 9247445. DOI: 10.5125/jkaoms.2022.48.3.159.


Marginal bone level changes in association with different vertical implant positions: a 3-year retrospective study.

Kim Y, Lim G, Lee J, Jeong S J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2017; 47(4):231-239.

PMID: 28861287 PMC: 5577441. DOI: 10.5051/jpis.2017.47.4.231.

References
1.
WILDERMAN M, PENNEL B, King K, BARRON J . Histogenesis of repair following osseous surgery. J Periodontol. 1970; 41(10):551-65. DOI: 10.1902/jop.1970.41.10.551. View

2.
Hermann J, Buser D, Schenk R, Schoolfield J, Cochran D . Biologic Width around one- and two-piece titanium implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001; 12(6):559-71. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120603.x. View

3.
Jung Y, Han C, Lee K . A 1-year radiographic evaluation of marginal bone around dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996; 11(6):811-8. View

4.
Persson L, Lekholm U, Leonhardt A, Dahlen G, Lindhe J . Bacterial colonization on internal surfaces of Brånemark system implant components. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1996; 7(2):90-5. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070201.x. View

5.
Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Wennstrom J, Lindhe J . The peri-implant hard and soft tissues at different implant systems. A comparative study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1996; 7(3):212-9. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070303.x. View