» Articles » PMID: 21067545

State of the Art and Challenges in Sequence Based T-cell Epitope Prediction

Overview
Journal Immunome Res
Date 2010 Nov 12
PMID 21067545
Citations 32
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Sequence based T-cell epitope predictions have improved immensely in the last decade. From predictions of peptide binding to major histocompatibility complex molecules with moderate accuracy, limited allele coverage, and no good estimates of the other events in the antigen-processing pathway, the field has evolved significantly. Methods have now been developed that produce highly accurate binding predictions for many alleles and integrate both proteasomal cleavage and transport events. Moreover have so-called pan-specific methods been developed, which allow for prediction of peptide binding to MHC alleles characterized by limited or no peptide binding data. Most of the developed methods are publicly available, and have proven to be very useful as a shortcut in epitope discovery. Here, we will go through some of the history of sequence-based predictions of helper as well as cytotoxic T cell epitopes. We will focus on some of the most accurate methods and their basic background.

Citing Articles

DeepHLApan: A Deep Learning Approach for the Prediction of Peptide-HLA Binding and Immunogenicity.

Wu J, Li J, Chen S, Zhou Z Methods Mol Biol. 2024; 2809:237-244.

PMID: 38907901 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3874-3_15.


A state-of-the-art methodology for high-throughput in silico vaccine discovery against protozoan parasites and exemplified with discovered candidates for Toxoplasma gondii.

Goodswen S, Kennedy P, Ellis J Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):8243.

PMID: 37217589 PMC: 10201501. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-34863-9.


epitopepredict: a tool for integrated MHC binding prediction.

Farrell D GigaByte. 2023; 2021:gigabyte13.

PMID: 36824339 PMC: 9631954. DOI: 10.46471/gigabyte.13.


SILVI, an open-source pipeline for T-cell epitope selection.

Pissarra J, Dorkeld F, Loire E, Bonhomme V, Sereno D, Lemesre J PLoS One. 2022; 17(9):e0273494.

PMID: 36070252 PMC: 9451077. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273494.


Review on Approved and Inprogress COVID-19 Vaccines.

Farnudian-Habibi A, Mirjani M, Montazer V, Aliebrahimi S, Katouzian I, Abdolhosseini S Iran J Pharm Res. 2022; 21(1):e124228.

PMID: 36060923 PMC: 9420219. DOI: 10.5812/ijpr.124228.


References
1.
Nielsen M, Lundegaard C, Blicher T, Lamberth K, Harndahl M, Justesen S . NetMHCpan, a method for quantitative predictions of peptide binding to any HLA-A and -B locus protein of known sequence. PLoS One. 2007; 2(8):e796. PMC: 1949492. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000796. View

2.
Diez-Rivero C, Chenlo B, Zuluaga P, Reche P . Quantitative modeling of peptide binding to TAP using support vector machine. Proteins. 2009; 78(1):63-72. DOI: 10.1002/prot.22535. View

3.
Larsen M, Lundegaard C, Lamberth K, Buus S, Brunak S, Lund O . An integrative approach to CTL epitope prediction: a combined algorithm integrating MHC class I binding, TAP transport efficiency, and proteasomal cleavage predictions. Eur J Immunol. 2005; 35(8):2295-303. DOI: 10.1002/eji.200425811. View

4.
Nielsen M, Lund O, Buus S, Lundegaard C . MHC class II epitope predictive algorithms. Immunology. 2010; 130(3):319-28. PMC: 2913211. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2010.03268.x. View

5.
Lundegaard C, Lund O, Kesmir C, Brunak S, Nielsen M . Modeling the adaptive immune system: predictions and simulations. Bioinformatics. 2007; 23(24):3265-75. PMC: 7110254. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm471. View