» Articles » PMID: 21055514

Evaluation of the Introduction of Robotic Technology on Route of Hysterectomy and Complications in the First Year of Use

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2010 Nov 9
PMID 21055514
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: We sought to determine the differential rates and complications of hysterectomy type in the year prior to and following the introduction of robotic technology.

Study Design: This was a retrospective chart review of 461 hysterectomies performed from July 2007 through June 2008 (period 1) and July 2008 through June 2009 (period 2) at Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center.

Results: In all, 199 vs 262 hysterectomies were performed in periods 1 and 2: open, 52.3% vs 43.1%; laparoscopic, 18.1% vs 8.0%; robotic, 2.5% vs 24.8%; and vaginal, 27.4% vs 24.1%, respectively. The increase in robotic hysterectomies in period 2 was associated only with a decline in laparoscopic hysterectomy (P < .0001). Major morbidity by route was 23.04% open, 11/1% vaginal, 7.02% laparoscopic, and 4.29% robotic (P < .0001).

Conclusion: Route of hysterectomy changed significantly after the introduction of robotic technology primarily due to a change in management of pelvic organ prolapse. Open hysterectomy was associated with significantly higher complication rates.

Citing Articles

Robotics-assisted surgery in gynecology: A single-center experience with the Hugo™ RAS system in India.

Anagani M, Ganga R, Paritala S Womens Health (Lond). 2025; 21:17455057241302581.

PMID: 40033655 PMC: 11877460. DOI: 10.1177/17455057241302581.


Implementation of robotic gynecological surgery in a German University Hospital: patient safety after 110 procedures.

Balafoutas D, Wockel A, Wulff C, Joukhadar R Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020; 302(6):1381-1388.

PMID: 32844240 PMC: 7584536. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-020-05751-8.


Direct cost of hysterectomy: comparison of robotic versus other routes.

Kaaki B, Lewis E, Takallapally S, Cleveland B J Robot Surg. 2019; 14(2):305-310.

PMID: 31165995 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-019-00982-7.


Review of Robotic Surgery in Gynecology-The Future Is Here.

Lauterbach R, Matanes E, Lowenstein L Rambam Maimonides Med J. 2017; 8(2).

PMID: 28467761 PMC: 5415365. DOI: 10.5041/RMMJ.10296.


Analysis of postoperative pain in robotic versus traditional laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Betcher R, Chaney J, Lacy P, Otey S, Wood D J Robot Surg. 2016; 8(1):35-41.

PMID: 27637237 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-013-0418-z.