» Articles » PMID: 21050606

The AIS-2005 Revision in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Mission Accomplished or Problems for Future Research?

Overview
Date 2010 Nov 6
PMID 21050606
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) is commonly used to score injury severity and describe types of injuries. In 2005, the AIS-Head section was revised to capture more detailed information about head injuries and to better reflect their clinical severity, but the impact of these changes is largely unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare AIS-1998 and AIS-2005 coding of traumatic brain injuries (TBI) using medical records at a single Level I trauma center. We included patients with severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale 3-8) after blunt injury, excluding those who were missing medical records. Detailed descriptions of injuries were collected, then manually coded into AIS-1998 and AIS-2005 by the same Certified AIS Specialist. Compared to AIS-1998, AIS-2005 coded the same injuries with lower severity scores [p<0.01] and with decreased mean and maximum AIS-Head scores [p<0.01]. Of the types of traumatic brain injuries, most of the changes occurred among cerebellar and cerebral injuries. Traumatic hypoxic brain injury secondary to systemic dysfunction was captured by AIS-2005 but not by AIS-1998. However, AIS-2005 captured fewer loss of consciousness cases due to changes in criteria for coding concussive injury. In conclusion, changes from AIS-1998 to AIS-2005 result in significant differences in severity scores and types of injuries captured. This may complicate future TBI research by precluding direct comparison to datasets using AIS-1998. TBIs should be coded into the same AIS-version for comparison or evaluation of trends, and specify which AIS-version is used.

Citing Articles

Lactate Is a Strong Predictor of Poor Outcomes in Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

Sharma B, Jiang W, Dhole Y, Agriantonis G, Bhatia N, Shafaee Z Biomedicines. 2025; 12(12.

PMID: 39767684 PMC: 11673745. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12122778.


Utilizing ultra-early continuous physiologic data to develop automated measures of clinical severity in a traumatic brain injury population.

Yang S, Hu P, Kalpakis K, Burdette B, Chen H, Parikh G Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):7618.

PMID: 38556518 PMC: 10982286. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-57538-5.


Estimating the health burden of road traffic injuries in Malawi using an individual-based model.

Manning Smith R, Cambiano V, Colbourn T, Collins J, Graham M, Jewell B Inj Epidemiol. 2022; 9(1):21.

PMID: 35821170 PMC: 9275162. DOI: 10.1186/s40621-022-00386-6.


The relationship between road traffic collision dynamics and traumatic brain injury pathology.

Baker C, Martin P, Wilson M, Ghajari M, Sharp D Brain Commun. 2022; 4(2):fcac033.

PMID: 35291690 PMC: 8914876. DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcac033.


Does access to acute intensive trauma rehabilitation (AITR) programs affect the disposition of brain injury patients?.

Chowdhury S, Leenen L PLoS One. 2021; 16(8):e0256314.

PMID: 34398906 PMC: 8366995. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256314.


References
1.
Barnes J, Hassan A, Cuerden R, Cookson R, Kohlhofer J . Comparison of injury severity between AIS 2005 and AIS 1990 in a large injury database. Ann Adv Automot Med. 2010; 53:83-9. PMC: 3256797. View

2.
. Rating the severity of tissue damage. I. The abbreviated scale. JAMA. 1971; 215(2):277-80. DOI: 10.1001/jama.1971.03180150059012. View

3.
Sosin D, Sniezek J, Waxweiler R . Trends in death associated with traumatic brain injury, 1979 through 1992. Success and failure. JAMA. 1995; 273(22):1778-80. View

4.
Skaga N, Eken T, Hestnes M, Jones J, Steen P . Scoring of anatomic injury after trauma: AIS 98 versus AIS 90--do the changes affect overall severity assessment?. Injury. 2006; 38(1):84-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.04.123. View

5.
Adekoya N, Thurman D, White D, Webb K . Surveillance for traumatic brain injury deaths--United States, 1989-1998. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2003; 51(10):1-14. View