Paromomycin for the Treatment of Visceral Leishmaniasis in Sudan: a Randomized, Open-label, Dose-finding Study
Overview
Tropical Medicine
Authors
Affiliations
Background: A recent study has shown that treatment of visceral leishmaniasis (VL) with the standard dose of 15 mg/kg/day of paromomycin sulphate (PM) for 21 days was not efficacious in patients in Sudan. We therefore decided to test the efficacy of paramomycin for a longer treatment duration (15 mg/kg/day for 28 days) and at the higher dose of 20 mg/kg/day for 21 days.
Methods: This randomized, open-label, dose-finding, phase II study assessed the two above high-dose PM treatment regimens. Patients with clinical features and positive bone-marrow aspirates for VL were enrolled. All patients received their assigned courses of PM intramuscularly and adverse events were monitored. Parasite clearance in bone-marrow aspirates was tested by microscopy at end of treatment (EOT, primary efficacy endpoint), 3 months (in patients who were not clinically well) and 6 months after EOT (secondary efficacy endpoint). Pharmacokinetic data were obtained from a subset of patients weighing over 30 kg.
Findings: 42 patients (21 per group) aged between 4 and 60 years were enrolled. At EOT, 85% of patients (95% confidence interval [CI]: 63.7% to 97.0%) in the 20 mg/kg/day group and 90% of patients (95% CI: 69.6% to 98.8%) in the 15 mg/kg/day group had parasite clearance. Six months after treatment, efficacy was 80.0% (95% CI: 56.3% to 94.3%) and 81.0% (95% CI: 58.1% to 94.6%) in the 20 mg/kg/day and 15 mg/kg/day groups, respectively. There were no serious adverse events. Pharmacokinetic profiles suggested a difference between the two doses, although numbers of patients recruited were too few to make it significant (n = 3 and n = 6 in the 20 mg/kg/day and 15 mg/kg/day groups, respectively).
Conclusion: Data suggest that both high dose regimens were more efficacious than the standard 15 mg/kg/day PM for 21 days and could be further evaluated in phase III studies in East Africa.
Identification of FDA-approved drugs that induce heart regeneration in mammals.
Ahmed M, Nguyen N, Nakada Y, Hsu C, Farag A, Lam N Nat Cardiovasc Res. 2024; 3(3):372-388.
PMID: 39183959 PMC: 11343477. DOI: 10.1038/s44161-024-00450-y.
Tulloch L, Tinti M, Wall R, Weidt S, Corpas-Lopez V, Dey G PLoS Pathog. 2024; 20(7):e1012382.
PMID: 38991025 PMC: 11265716. DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1012382.
Ferreira B, Coser E, de la Roca S, Aoki J, Branco N, Soares G PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2024; 18(5):e0012175.
PMID: 38768213 PMC: 11142706. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012175.
Hendrickx S, Feijens P, Escudie F, Chatelain E, Maes L, Caljon G ACS Infect Dis. 2024; 10(6):2101-2107.
PMID: 38733389 PMC: 11423396. DOI: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.4c00109.
The Potential Use of Peptides in the Fight against Chagas Disease and Leishmaniasis.
Berhe H, Kumar Cinthakunta Sridhar M, Zerihun M, Qvit N Pharmaceutics. 2024; 16(2).
PMID: 38399281 PMC: 10892537. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16020227.