Marking Live Conifer Pollen for Long-distance Dispersal Experiments

Overview

Journal Oecologia

Specialty Environmental Health

Date 2010 Nov 3

PMID 21042921

Authors

Claire G Williams

Patrick von Aderkas

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Long-distance dispersal (LDD) theory requires a method for marking live LDD pollen. Such a method must complement more intensive sampling methods inclusive of molecular cytogenetics, proteomics and genomics. We developed a new method for marking live Pinus taeda pollen using two dyes, rhodamine 123 and aniline blue, dissolved in a sucrose solution. Marked and unmarked pollen were compared with respect to in vitro germination, storage, terminal velocity, and in vivo pollen tube penetration of ovules. We found that: (1) both types of marked pollen retained their capacity for germination, (2) both types of marked pollen had similar aerodynamic properties when compared to unmarked pollen controls, (3) marked pollen retained its germination capacity for 48 h, and (4) of the marked pollen, only the aniline-marked pollen penetrated ovules during pollination. Germination declined rapidly for both types of marked pollen after 48 h and before 37 days at -20°C storage, while unmarked pollen lots retained 93% germination at all stages. This method for marking live P. taeda pollen is feasible for tracing LDD pollen only if released and deposited within 48 h of dye treatment.

References

Bohne G, Woehlecke H, Ehwald R . Water relations of the pine exine. Ann Bot. 2005; 96(2):201-8. PMC: 4246869. DOI: 10.1093/aob/mci169. View

Leslie A . Flotation preferentially selects saccate pollen during conifer pollination. New Phytol. 2010; 188(1):273-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03356.x. View

Watrud L, Lee E, Fairbrother A, Burdick C, Reichman J, Bollman M . Evidence for landscape-level, pollen-mediated gene flow from genetically modified creeping bentgrass with CP4 EPSPS as a marker. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004; 101(40):14533-8. PMC: 521937. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0405154101. View

Ito M, Suyama Y, Ohsawa T, Watano Y . Airborne-pollen pool and mating pattern in a hybrid zone between Pinus pumila and P. parviflora var. pentaphylla. Mol Ecol. 2009; 17(23):5092-103. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03966.x. View

Parducci L, Suyama Y, Lascoux M, Bennett K . Ancient DNA from pollen: a genetic record of population history in Scots pine. Mol Ecol. 2005; 14(9):2873-82. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02644.x. View

Williams C . Selfed embryo death in Pinus taeda: a phenotypic profile. New Phytol. 2008; 178(1):210-222. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02359.x. View

Williams C . Long-distance pine pollen still germinates after meso-scale dispersal. Am J Bot. 2011; 97(5):846-55. DOI: 10.3732/ajb.0900255. View

Kostia S, Varvio S, Vakkari P, Pulkkinen P . Microsatellite sequences in a conifer, Pinus sylvestris. Genome. 1995; 38(6):1244-8. DOI: 10.1139/g95-163. View

Austerlitz F, Dick C, Dutech C, Klein E, Oddou-Muratorio S, Smouse P . Using genetic markers to estimate the pollen dispersal curve. Mol Ecol. 2004; 13(4):937-54. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294x.2004.02100.x. View

10.

Aitken S, Yeaman S, Holliday J, Wang T, Curtis-McLane S . Adaptation, migration or extirpation: climate change outcomes for tree populations. Evol Appl. 2015; 1(1):95-111. PMC: 3352395. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2007.00013.x. View

11.

Katul G, Porporato A, Nathan R, Siqueira M, Soons M, Poggi D . Mechanistic analytical models for long-distance seed dispersal by wind. Am Nat. 2005; 166(3):368-81. DOI: 10.1086/432589. View

12.

Kuparinen A . Mechanistic models for wind dispersal. Trends Plant Sci. 2006; 11(6):296-301. DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2006.04.006. View

13.

Alexander M . Differential staining of aborted and nonaborted pollen. Stain Technol. 1969; 44(3):117-22. DOI: 10.3109/10520296909063335. View

14.

Regan S, Moffatt B . Cytochemical Analysis of Pollen Development in Wild-Type Arabidopsis and a Male-Sterile Mutant. Plant Cell. 1990; 2(9):877-889. PMC: 159938. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.2.9.877. View