» Articles » PMID: 21037344

Changes in Bone Mineral Density in the Proximal Femur After Hip Resurfacing and Uncemented Total Hip Replacement: A Prospective Randomised Controlled Study

Overview
Date 2010 Nov 2
PMID 21037344
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We undertook a randomised prospective follow-up study of changes in peri-prosthetic bone mineral density (BMD) after hip resurfacing and compared them with the results after total hip replacement. A total of 59 patients were allocated to receive a hip resurfacing (n = 29) or an uncemented distally fixed total hip replacement (n = 30). The BMD was prospectively determined in four separate regions of interest of the femoral neck and in the calcar region corresponding to Gruen zone 7 for the hip resurfacing group and compared only to the calcar region in the total hip replacement group. Standardised measurements were performed pre-operatively and after three, six and 12 months. The groups were well matched in terms of gender distribution and mean age. The mean BMD in the calcar region increased after one year to 105.2% of baseline levels in the resurfaced group compared with a significant decrease to 82.1% in the total hip replacement group (p < 0.001) by 12 months. For the resurfaced group, there was a decrease in bone density in all four regions of the femoral neck at three months which did not reach statistical significance and was followed by recovery to baseline levels after 12 months. Hip resurfacing did indeed preserve BMD in the inferior femoral neck. In contrast, a decrease in the mean BMD in Gruen zone 7 followed uncemented distally fixed total hip replacement. Long term follow-up studies are necessary to see whether this benefit in preservation of BMD will be clinically relevant at future revision surgery.

Citing Articles

Bone mineral density around cementless short stems after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: changes over time and its relationship to stem positioning.

Nakazawa K, Manaka T, Hirakawa Y, Ito Y, Iio R, Oi N JSES Int. 2024; 8(1):119-125.

PMID: 38312281 PMC: 10837704. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.08.015.


Prediction of Bone Mineral Density (BMD) Adaptation in Pelvis-Femur Model with Hip Arthroplasties.

Abdullah A, Todo M J Funct Biomater. 2021; 12(3).

PMID: 34564198 PMC: 8482249. DOI: 10.3390/jfb12030049.


A Comparative Cohort Study With a 20-Year Age Gap: Hip Resurfacing in Patients Aged ≤35 Years and Patients Aged ≥55 Years.

Morgenstern R, Denova T, Ren R, Su E Arthroplast Today. 2021; 7:22-28.

PMID: 33521193 PMC: 7818604. DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2020.11.006.


Resurfacing hip arthroplasty better preserves a normal gait pattern at increasing walking speeds compared to total hip arthroplasty.

Gerhardt D, Mors T, Hannink G, van Susante J Acta Orthop. 2019; 90(3):231-236.

PMID: 30931667 PMC: 6534262. DOI: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1594096.


Birmingham hip resurfacing versus cementless total hip arthroplasty in patients 55 years or younger: A minimum five-year follow-up.

Halawi M, Oak S, Brigati D, Siggers A, Messner W, Brooks P J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2018; 9(4):285-288.

PMID: 30449971 PMC: 6224684. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2017.05.004.