» Articles » PMID: 21030334

Periprocedural Safety of 64-detector Row Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography: Results from the Prospective Multicenter ACCURACY Trial

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2010 Oct 30
PMID 21030334
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) requires iodinated contrast and often atrioventricular nodal blocking agents and nitroglycerin for heart rate lowering and coronary vasodilation, respectively. To date, the periprocedural safety of CCTA is unknown.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the periprocedural safety of CCTA.

Methods: We prospectively evaluated 232 patients with symptomatic chest pain without preexisting renal insufficiency at 16 sites who underwent CCTA as part of the Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography (ACCURACY) trial. Patients received iodinated contrast, β-blockers, and nitroglycerin as part of a predefined CCTA protocol. We assessed the rates of adverse events (AEs) related to these agents.

Results: As measured by serum creatinine and creatinine clearance, no significant change was observed in renal function from baseline (1.00 ± 0.19 mg/dL; modification of diet in renal disease [MDRD]: 76.91 ± 17.96 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) to 48 hours (1.0 ± 0.2 mg/dL; P = 1.00; MDRD change: 0.2 ± 12.4 mL/min/1.73 m(2); P = 0.83) or at 30 days (1.0 ± 0.2 mg/dL; P = 0.52; MDRD change: -0.9 ± 16.9 mL/min/1.73 m(2); P = 0.77). Mean systolic blood pressure decreased from baseline (133 ± 19 mm Hg) at 1 hour (125 ± 17 mm Hg; P < 0.001) and rebounded at 48 hours (133 ± 17 mm Hg). Mean heart rate decreased from baseline (65 ± 10 beats/min) at 1 hour (60 ± 7 beats/min) but rose at 48 hours (69 ± 11 beats/min; P < 0.001. All patients were asymptomatic from baseline to follow-up.

Conclusions: The performance of CCTA is safe with low rates of AEs.

Citing Articles

Reliability of cardiac computed tomography examination in cardiac pathology - a case series and literature review.

Capisizu A, Stanciu S, Cuzino D J Med Life. 2023; 16(7):1140-1146.

PMID: 37900066 PMC: 10600673. DOI: 10.25122/jml-2023-0268.


Factors influencing the safety of outpatient coronary CT angiography: a clinical registry study.

Florian Andre , Fortner P, Emami M, Seitz S, Brado M, Guckel F BMJ Open. 2022; 12(8):e058304.

PMID: 35940836 PMC: 9364403. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058304.


Costs and clinical outcomes for non-invasive versus invasive diagnostic approaches to patients with suspected in-stent restenosis.

Min J, Hasegawa J, Machacz S, ODay K Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015; 32(2):309-315.

PMID: 26335370 PMC: 4740289. DOI: 10.1007/s10554-015-0758-z.


Coronary artery disease in patients with atypical chest pain with and without diabetes mellitus assessed with coronary CT angiography.

Krul M, Bogaard K, Knol R, van Rossum A, Knaapen P, Cornel J BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2014; 2(1):e000004.

PMID: 25452855 PMC: 4212558. DOI: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2013-000004.


Identification of noncalcified plaque in young persons with diabetes: an opportunity for early primary prevention of coronary artery disease identified with low-dose coronary computed tomographic angiography.

Madaj P, Budoff M, Li D, Tayek J, Karlsberg R, Karpman H Acad Radiol. 2012; 19(7):889-93.

PMID: 22542200 PMC: 4277701. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2012.03.013.