» Articles » PMID: 21029129

Maximizing Efficiency of Alternation Algorithms for Hemodynamic Optimization of the AV Delay of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Overview
Date 2010 Oct 30
PMID 21029129
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: During optimization of the atrioventricular (AV) delay of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), it is not known exactly which windows of time around the transition are most informative for identification of the optimum.

Method And Results: IN 22 patients with CRT, we performed AV delay optimization using continuous noninvasive hemodynamics. We used signal-to-noise ratio to determine the most efficient averaging window location and width. We found that it is most efficient to position the averaging windows immediately before and immediately after the transition in AV delay. For example, skipping five beats after the transition decreases signal-to-noise ratio by 17.5% (P < 0.0001). Similarly, skipping five beats immediately before the transition reduces signal-to-noise ratio by 11.7% (P < 0.0001). The best choice of "fixed" averaging window width was found to be six beats, with signal-to-noise ratio falling by, for example, 41% for a one-beat window (P = 0.0002). However, even better was to set the window width for each patient to match one respiratory cycle. We observed that the pre- and posttransition signal-to-noise ratio traces begin to diverge three beats after the transition in AV delay. We believe this represents the time taken for the peripheral response to pacing-induced changes in stroke volume to occur.

Conclusions: THE most efficient way to use alternating transitions for the hemodynamic optimization of CRT is to use an averaging window of one respiratory cycle, and not to skip any beats between the pretransition and posttransition averaging windows.

Citing Articles

Central venous pressure as a method of optimising atrio-ventricular delay after cardiac surgery.

Tindale A, Cretu I, Gomez N, Haynes R, Meng H, Mason M PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0310905.

PMID: 39823433 PMC: 11741378. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310905.


A comparison of different methods to maximise signal extraction when using central venous pressure to optimise atrioventricular delay after cardiac surgery.

Cretu I, Tindale A, Abbod M, Balachandran W, Khir A, Meng H Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2024; 51:101382.

PMID: 38496260 PMC: 10944103. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101382.


Effects of haemodynamically atrio-ventricular optimized His bundle pacing on heart failure symptoms and exercise capacity: the His Optimized Pacing Evaluated for Heart Failure (HOPE-HF) randomized, double-blind, cross-over trial.

Whinnett Z, Shun-Shin M, Tanner M, Foley P, Chandrasekaran B, Moore P Eur J Heart Fail. 2022; 25(2):274-283.

PMID: 36404397 PMC: 10946926. DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.2736.


Optimizing atrio-ventricular delay in pacemakers using potentially implantable physiological biomarkers.

Keene D, Miyazawa A, Johal M, Arnold A, Ali N, Saqi K Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2021; 45(4):461-470.

PMID: 34967945 PMC: 9305784. DOI: 10.1111/pace.14434.


Evaluation of the therapeutic effects of QuickOpt optimization in Chinese patients with chronic heart failure treated by cardiac resynchronization.

Yan J, Zhang S, Huang D, Xue X, Xu J, Tao Q Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):4259.

PMID: 29523823 PMC: 5844885. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-22525-0.