» Articles » PMID: 20978827

Quantitative Clinical Pharmacology is Transforming Drug Regulation

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2010 Oct 28
PMID 20978827
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Prior to 1970s, development and regulation of new drugs was devoid of a fully quantitative, pathophysiological conceptual foundation. Malcolm Rowland pioneered, in collaboration with colleagues and friends, our modern understanding of drug clearance concepts, and equipped drug development and regulatory scientists with key investigative tools such as physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling, standardized approaches to characterizing drug metabolism, and microdosing. From the 1970s to the present, Malcolm Rowland has contributed to key advances in pharmacokinetics that have had transformational impacts on drug regulatory science. These advances include concepts that have led to the fundamental understanding that mechanistically derived, quantitative variations in drug concentrations, rather than assigned dosage alone, drive pharmacodynamic effects (PKPD)-including disease biomarkers and clinical outcomes. This body of knowledge has transformed drug development and regulatory science theory and practice from naïve empiricism to a mechanism/model-based, quantitative scientific discipline. As a result, it is now possible to incorporate pre-clinical in vitro data on drug physico-chemical properties, metabolizing enzymes, transporters and permeability properties into PBPK-based simulations of expected PK distributions and drug-drug interactions in human populations. The most comprehensive application of PK-PD is in the modeling and simulation of clinical trials in the context of model-based drug development and regulation, imbedded in the "learn-confirm paradigm". Regulatory agencies have embraced these advances and incorporated them into regulatory requirements, approval acceleration pathways and regulatory decisions. These developments are reviewed here, with emphasis on key contributions of Malcolm Rowland that facilitated this transformation.

Citing Articles

How to Handle Delayed or Missed Doses: A Population Pharmacokinetic Perspective.

Gu J, Guo Y, Jiao Z, Ding J, Li G Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2019; 45(2):163-172.

PMID: 31792726 DOI: 10.1007/s13318-019-00598-0.


Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Relationship of Blinatumomab in Patients with Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.

Hijazi Y, Klinger M, Kratzer A, Wu B, Baeuerle P, Kufer P Curr Clin Pharmacol. 2018; 13(1):55-64.

PMID: 29773068 PMC: 6327122. DOI: 10.2174/1574884713666180518102514.


Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Modeling in Pediatric Drug Development, and the Importance of Standardized Scaling of Clearance.

Germovsek E, Barker C, Sharland M, Standing J Clin Pharmacokinet. 2018; 58(1):39-52.

PMID: 29675639 PMC: 6325987. DOI: 10.1007/s40262-018-0659-0.


Model Informed Pediatric Development Applied to Bilastine: Ontogenic PK Model Development, Dose Selection for First Time in Children and PK Study Design.

Vozmediano V, Sologuren A, Lukas J, Leal N, Rodriguez M Pharm Res. 2017; 34(12):2720-2734.

PMID: 28971281 DOI: 10.1007/s11095-017-2248-6.


Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic models: approaches for enabling personalized medicine.

Hartmanshenn C, Scherholz M, Androulakis I J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2016; 43(5):481-504.

PMID: 27647273 PMC: 5204363. DOI: 10.1007/s10928-016-9492-y.


References
1.
Goodsaid F, Frueh F . Implementing the U.S. FDA guidance on pharmacogenomic data submissions. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2007; 48(5):354-8. DOI: 10.1002/em.20294. View

2.
Oo C, Chen Y . The need for multiple doses of 400 mg ketoconazole as a precipitant inhibitor of a CYP3A substrate in an in vivo drug-drug interaction study. J Clin Pharmacol. 2009; 49(3):368-9. DOI: 10.1177/0091270008325931. View

3.
Sheiner L, Rosenberg B, Marathe V . Estimation of population characteristics of pharmacokinetic parameters from routine clinical data. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1977; 5(5):445-79. DOI: 10.1007/BF01061728. View

4.
Miller R, Ewy W, Corrigan B, Ouellet D, Hermann D, Kowalski K . How modeling and simulation have enhanced decision making in new drug development. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2005; 32(2):185-97. DOI: 10.1007/s10928-005-0074-7. View

5.
Huang S, Goodsaid F, Rahman A, Frueh F, Lesko L . Application of pharmacogenomics in clinical pharmacology. Toxicol Mech Methods. 2009; 16(2-3):89-99. DOI: 10.1080/15376520600558333. View