» Articles » PMID: 20976620

A Strategy for Assessing Costs of Implementing New Practices in the Child Welfare System: Adapting the English Cost Calculator in the United States

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Public Health
Date 2010 Oct 27
PMID 20976620
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In decisions to adopt and implement new practices or innovations in child welfare, costs are often a bottom-line consideration. The cost calculator, a method developed in England that can be used to calculate unit costs of core case work activities and associated administrative costs, is described as a potentially helpful tool for assisting child welfare administrators to evaluate the costs of current practices relative to their outcomes and could impact decisions about whether to implement new practices. The process by which the cost calculator is being adapted for use in US child welfare systems in two states is described and an illustration of using the method to compare two intervention approaches is provided.

Citing Articles

Michigan Model for Health Learning to Enhance and Adapt for Prevention (Mi-LEAP): protocol of a pilot randomized trial comparing Enhanced Replicating Effective Programs versus standard implementation to deliver an evidence-based drug use prevention....

Eisman A, Palinkas L, Koffkey C, Herrenkohl T, Abbasi U, Fridline J Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022; 8(1):204.

PMID: 36088351 PMC: 9463731. DOI: 10.1186/s40814-022-01145-6.


The Elusive Search for Success: Defining and Measuring Implementation Outcomes in a Real-World Hospital Trial.

Shepherd H, Geerligs L, Butow P, Masya L, Shaw J, Price M Front Public Health. 2019; 7:293.

PMID: 31681724 PMC: 6813570. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00293.


Reducing Cardiovascular Disparities Through Community-Engaged Implementation Research: A National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Workshop Report.

Mensah G, Cooper R, Siega-Riz A, Cooper L, Smith J, Brown C Circ Res. 2018; 122(2):213-230.

PMID: 29348251 PMC: 5777283. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.312243.


Testing the leadership and organizational change for implementation (LOCI) intervention in substance abuse treatment: a cluster randomized trial study protocol.

Aarons G, Ehrhart M, Moullin J, Torres E, Green A Implement Sci. 2017; 12(1):29.

PMID: 28253900 PMC: 5335741. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-017-0562-3.


Characterizing implementation strategies using a systems engineering survey and interview tool: a comparison across 10 prevention programs for drug abuse and HIV sexual risk behavior.

Czaja S, Valente T, Nair S, Villamar J, Brown C Implement Sci. 2016; 11:70.

PMID: 27184963 PMC: 4869203. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-016-0433-3.


References
1.
Rubin D, Alessandrini E, Feudtner C, Russell Localio A, Hadley T . Placement changes and emergency department visits in the first year of foster care. Pediatrics. 2004; 114(3):e354-60. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2003-0594-F. View

2.
COURTNEY M . The costs of child protection in the context of welfare reform. Future Child. 1998; 8(1):88-103. View

3.
Dishion T, McCord J, Poulin F . When interventions harm. Peer groups and problem behavior. Am Psychol. 1999; 54(9):755-64. DOI: 10.1037//0003-066x.54.9.755. View

4.
Aarons G, Hurlburt M, Horwitz S . Advancing a conceptual model of evidence-based practice implementation in public service sectors. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011; 38(1):4-23. PMC: 3025110. DOI: 10.1007/s10488-010-0327-7. View

5.
Chamberlain P, Price J, Leve L, Laurent H, Landsverk J, Reid J . Prevention of behavior problems for children in foster care: outcomes and mediation effects. Prev Sci. 2008; 9(1):17-27. PMC: 4046586. DOI: 10.1007/s11121-007-0080-7. View