Intensive Glycaemic Control and Cancer Risk in Type 2 Diabetes: a Meta-analysis of Major Trials
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Aims/hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes and risk of cancer incidence or cancer mortality. We were interested to determine if data from major randomised controlled trials would support a hypothesis that improving glycaemic control may reduce the risk of cancer outcomes.
Methods: We included major randomised controlled trials conducted with an overall aim of intensified glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes. We abstracted data from published papers and supplemental material and conducted separate meta-analyses of cancer mortality and cancer incidence.
Results: Four trials reported cancer mortality for the intensive (222 events in 53,892 person-years) and standard control (155 events in 38,743 person-years) arms (UK Prospective Diabetes Study [UKPDS] 33, UKPDS 34, Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes [ACCORD] and Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial [VADT]); the summary risk ratio for cancer mortality was 1.00 (95% CI 0.81-1.24; I² = 0%). Excluding the UKPDS metformin trial resulted in a pooled risk estimate of 1.03 (95% CI 0.83-1.29; I² = 0%). Three trials reported cancer incidence for the study arms (Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron MR Controlled Evaluation [ADVANCE], PROspective pioglitAzone Clinical Trial In macroVascular Events [PROactive], Rosiglitazone Evaluated for Cardiac Outcomes and Regulation of Glycaemia in Diabetes [RECORD]) with 357 events in 47,974 person-years with improved glycaemic control and 380 events in 45,009 person-years in the control arms; the pooled risk ratio for cancer incidence was 0.91 (95% CI 0.79-1.05; I² = 0%).
Conclusions/interpretation: Data from large randomised controlled trials of intensified glycaemic control suggest that cancer risk is not reduced by improving glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes. These data therefore do not support the hypothesis that hyperglycaemia is causally linked to increased cancer risk.
Tseng Y, Tsan Y, Chen P J Diabetes Investig. 2024; 16(1):16-24.
PMID: 39575899 PMC: 11693530. DOI: 10.1111/jdi.14364.
Wright J, Eskaros A, Windon A, Bottino R, Jenkins R, Bradley A Diabetes. 2023; 73(7):1140-1152.
PMID: 37881846 PMC: 11189834. DOI: 10.2337/db23-0009.
Ennis C, Llevenes P, Qiu Y, Dries R, Denis G Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022; 13:1044670.
PMID: 36531496 PMC: 9751481. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1044670.
Moshkovits Y, Rott D, Chetrit A, Dankner R PLoS One. 2022; 17(8):e0272437.
PMID: 35921366 PMC: 9348742. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272437.
The burden and risks of emerging complications of diabetes mellitus.
Tomic D, Shaw J, Magliano D Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2022; 18(9):525-539.
PMID: 35668219 PMC: 9169030. DOI: 10.1038/s41574-022-00690-7.