» Articles » PMID: 20956623

Prognostic Factors in Patients with Metastatic Germ Cell Tumors Who Experienced Treatment Failure with Cisplatin-based First-line Chemotherapy

Abstract

Purpose: To develop a prognostic model in patients with germ cell tumors (GCT) who experience treatment failure with cisplatin-based first-line chemotherapy.

Patients And Methods: Data from 1,984 patients with GCT who progressed after at least three cisplatin-based cycles and were treated with cisplatin-based conventional-dose or carboplatin-based high-dose salvage chemotherapy was retrospectively collected from 38 centers/groups worldwide. One thousand five hundred ninety-four (80%) of 1,984 eligible patients were randomly divided into a training set of 1,067 patients (67%) and a validation set of 527 patients (33%). Seminomas were set aside for posthoc analyses. Primary end point was the 2-year progression-free survival after salvage treatment.

Results: Overall, 990 patients (62%) relapsed and 604 patients (38%) remained relapse free. Histology, primary tumor location, response, and progression-free interval after first-line treatment, as well as levels of alpha fetoprotein, human chorionic gonadotrophin, and the presence of liver, bone, or brain metastases at salvage were identified as independent prognostic variables and used to build a prognostic model in the training set. Survival rates in the training and validation set were very similar. The estimated 2-year progression-free survival rates in patients not included in the training set was 75% in very low risk, 51% in low risk, 40% in intermediate risk, 26% in high risk, and only 6% in very high-risk patients. Due to missing values in individual variables, 69 patients could not reliably be classified into one of these categories.

Conclusion: Prognostic variables are important in patients with GCT who experienced treatment failure with cisplatin-based first-line chemotherapy and can be used to construct a prognostic model to guide salvage strategies.

Citing Articles

Late side effects of testicular cancer and treatment: a comprehensive review.

Khan M, Sheehan P, Bazin A, Leonard C, Aleem U, Corrigan L Discov Oncol. 2024; 15(1):646.

PMID: 39532799 PMC: 11557811. DOI: 10.1007/s12672-024-01549-1.


High-dose chemotherapy as initial salvage chemotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory testicular cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Briones J, Diaz P, Nicholson B Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1437574.

PMID: 39411122 PMC: 11473300. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1437574.


Follow-Up of Patients Diagnosed With Germinal Testicular Tumors (Seminomas and Non-seminomatous) Treated With a Bone Marrow Transplant and a High Dose of Chemotherapy.

Zapata Laguado M, Contreras Mejia F, Pereira Garzon M Cureus. 2024; 16(6):e61887.

PMID: 38978935 PMC: 11228413. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.61887.


SEOM-GG clinical guidelines for the management of germ-cell testicular cancer (2023).

Arranz Arija J, Garcia Del Muro X, Caro R, Mendez-Vidal M, Perez-Valderrama B, Aparicio J Clin Transl Oncol. 2024; 26(11):2783-2799.

PMID: 38958901 PMC: 11467073. DOI: 10.1007/s12094-024-03532-2.


Outcomes of upfront plerixafor use for mobilization in germ cell tumor patients.

Cohen J, Shah S, Piedra K, Shalhoub S, Benjamin C, Pereira D Hematol Transfus Cell Ther. 2024; 46 Suppl 5:S37-S42.

PMID: 38485549 PMC: 11670621. DOI: 10.1016/j.htct.2023.12.008.