» Articles » PMID: 20950851

Biocompatibility of Adhesive Complex Coacervates Modeled After the Sandcastle Glue of Phragmatopoma Californica for Craniofacial Reconstruction

Overview
Journal Biomaterials
Date 2010 Oct 19
PMID 20950851
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Craniofacial reconstruction would benefit from a degradable adhesive capable of holding bone fragments in three-dimensional alignment and gradually being replaced by new bone without loss of alignment or volume changes. Modeled after a natural adhesive secreted by the sandcastle worm, we studied the biocompatibility of adhesive complex coacervates in vitro and in vivo with two different rat calvarial models. We found that the adhesive was non-cytotoxic and supported the attachment, spreading, and migration of a commonly used osteoblastic cell line over the course of several days. In animal studies we found that the adhesive was capable of maintaining three-dimensional bone alignment in freely moving rats over a 12 week indwelling period. Histological evidence indicated that the adhesive was gradually resorbed and replaced by new bone that became lamellar across the defect without loss of alignment, changes in volume, or changes in the adjacent uninjured bone. The presence of inflammatory cells was consistent with what has been reported with other craniofacial fixation methods including metal plates, screws, tacks, calcium phosphate cements and cyanoacrylate adhesives. Collectively, the results suggest that the new bioadhesive formulation is degradable, osteoconductive and appears suitable for use in the reconstruction of craniofacial fractures.

Citing Articles

Sticky Science: Using Complex Coacervate Adhesives for Biomedical Applications.

Kwant A, Es Sayed J, Kamperman M, Burgess J, Slebos D, Pouwels S Adv Healthc Mater. 2024; 14(2):e2402340.

PMID: 39352099 PMC: 11730373. DOI: 10.1002/adhm.202402340.


An Overview on the Adhesion Mechanisms of Typical Aquatic Organisms and the Applications of Biomimetic Adhesives in Aquatic Environments.

Liu J, Song J, Zeng L, Hu B Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(14).

PMID: 39063236 PMC: 11277488. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25147994.


Bone adhesive materials: From bench to bedside.

Bingol H, Bender J, Opsteen J, Leeuwenburgh S Mater Today Bio. 2023; 19:100599.

PMID: 37063249 PMC: 10102013. DOI: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100599.


Balance of Macrophage Activation by a Complex Coacervate-Based Adhesive Drug Carrier Facilitates Diabetic Wound Healing.

Wang C, Luo S, Jia S, Wu W, Chang S, Feng S Antioxidants (Basel). 2022; 11(12).

PMID: 36552559 PMC: 9774176. DOI: 10.3390/antiox11122351.


Engineering of Biocompatible Coacervate-Based Synthetic Cells.

van Stevendaal M, Vasiukas L, Yewdall N, Mason A, van Hest J ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2021; 13(7):7879-7889.

PMID: 33587612 PMC: 7908014. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.0c19052.


References
1.
Stewart R, Weaver J, Morse D, Waite J . The tube cement of Phragmatopoma californica: a solid foam. J Exp Biol. 2004; 207(Pt 26):4727-34. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.01330. View

2.
Handschel J, Wiesmann H, Stratmann U, Kleinheinz J, Meyer U, Joos U . TCP is hardly resorbed and not osteoconductive in a non-loading calvarial model. Biomaterials. 2002; 23(7):1689-95. DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(01)00296-4. View

3.
Kamioka H, RIS H, Lim S . Osteocyte shape is dependent on actin filaments and osteocyte processes are unique actin-rich projections. J Bone Miner Res. 1998; 13(10):1555-68. DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.1998.13.10.1555. View

4.
Zhao H, Sun C, Stewart R, Waite J . Cement proteins of the tube-building polychaete Phragmatopoma californica. J Biol Chem. 2005; 280(52):42938-44. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M508457200. View

5.
Develioglu H, Saraydin S, Bolayir G, Dupoirieux L . Assessment of the effect of a biphasic ceramic on bone response in a rat calvarial defect model. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2006; 77(3):627-31. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.30692. View