Incidence and Clinical Significance of Arterial Injury in Varicocele Repair
Affiliations
Objective: • This study was performed to histologically determine the rate of arterial injury in varicocele ligation surgery and to determine the clinical significance of these arterial injuries.
Materials And Methods: • 41 men who underwent varicocele ligation surgery, and had segments of each ligated vessel examined histologically. • The patients were followed prospectively to determine the effect of arterial injury on surgical results and clinical complications.
Results: • Arterial ligation was identified in 6 of 41 patients (12%), and in 7 of 132 specimens (5%), which is higher than previous reports. • Arterial injury was not associated with testicular atrophy and there was no apparent effect of arterial injury on surgical outcome.
Conclusion: • The rate of arterial injury during varicocele repair is higher than previously reported, but the clinical significance of these injuries appears to be limited.
Incidence and Clinical Outcomes of Gonadal Artery Injury during Colorectal Surgery in Male Patients.
Hsu C, Chang M, Wang J, Wu C, Chen Y J Gastrointest Surg. 2019; 23(10):2075-2080.
PMID: 30937712 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-019-04197-x.
Zhang G, Yang J, Long D, Liu M, Zou X, Yuan Y Asian J Androl. 2016; 19(1):34-38.
PMID: 26732104 PMC: 5227670. DOI: 10.4103/1008-682X.169994.
Loupe-assisted versus microscopic varicocelectomy: is there an intraoperative anatomic difference?.
Zhang H, Liu X, Yang X, Huang W, Ruan X, Xiao H Asian J Androl. 2013; 16(1):112-4.
PMID: 24369142 PMC: 3901867. DOI: 10.4103/1008-682X.122189.
Macroscopic and microsurgical varicocelectomy: what's the intraoperative difference?.
Liu X, Zhang H, Ruan X, Xiao H, Huang W, Li L World J Urol. 2012; 31(3):603-8.
PMID: 23001636 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-012-0950-x.