» Articles » PMID: 20946740

Network Support As a Prognostic Indicator of Drinking Outcomes: the COMBINE Study

Overview
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2010 Oct 16
PMID 20946740
Citations 81
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To increase understanding of the interrelationship between a patient's social network and patient drinking, the Important People and Activities (IPA) instrument was developed. To meet the aims of the COMBINE (Combining Medications and Behavioral Interventions) Study, the IPA was modified to create the Important People Inventory (IPI), which was used to measure the contextual influence of the patient's social network on patient outcomes and treatment effects. The aims of the present article were to describe the IPI and its differences from the IPA and to test the relationship of network support as measured by the IPI in predicting drinking during and following treatment.

Method: Alcohol-dependent patients (N = 1,373) seeking outpatient treatment in the COMBINE randomized clinical trial were administered the IPI before treatment. Six network constructs were tested for predicting patient drinking.

Results: As unique effects, alcohol-specific support, as measured by network drinking and opposition to patient drinking, is predictive of patient abstinent days during and following treatment and heavy drinking days following treatment. Other measures of network support have variable relationships to patient drinking at different phases: Some are predictive of patient drinking during treatment but diminish, whereas others are unrelated to drinking during treatment but become increasingly predictive of drinking as time from treatment increases.

Conclusions: The IPI is a useful instrument for describing network support of alcohol-use disorder patients entering treatment. Measures of alcohol-specific support are prognostic of drinking outcomes. The patient's network support should be systematically assessed prior to tailored treatment planning.

Citing Articles

Trauma Exposure and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Among Youth in a High-Risk Family Study: Associations with Maternal and Paternal Alcohol Use Disorder.

Bender A, Bucholz K, Edenberg H, Kramer J, Anokhin A, Meyers J J Fam Trauma Child Custody Child Dev. 2024; 17(2):116-134.

PMID: 38827930 PMC: 11142461. DOI: 10.1080/26904586.2020.1751016.


Visualizing the Influence of Social Networks on Recovery: A Mixed-Methods Social Identity Mapping Study with Recovering Adolescents.

Hennessy E, Jurinsky J, Cowie K, Pietrzak A, Blyth S, Krasnoff P Subst Use Misuse. 2024; 59(9):1405-1415.

PMID: 38738809 PMC: 11191070. DOI: 10.1080/10826084.2024.2352618.


Perinatal women in substance use disorder treatment: Interest in partnering with family and friends to support recovery needs.

Hammond A, Antoine D, Sklar M, Kidorf M J Addict Dis. 2024; :1-7.

PMID: 38712861 PMC: 11540869. DOI: 10.1080/10550887.2024.2344837.


A Bluetooth-Based Smartphone App for Detecting Peer Proximity: Protocol for Evaluating Functionality and Validity.

Barnett N, Sokolovsky A, Meisel M, Forkus S, Jackson K JMIR Res Protoc. 2024; 13():e50241.

PMID: 38578672 PMC: 11031693. DOI: 10.2196/50241.


An Implementation Approach to Translating Assessment Data into Treatment for Disorders of Addiction.

Bourdon J, Fields T, Judson S, Vadhan N, Morgenstern J Inquiry. 2024; 61:469580241237117.

PMID: 38477304 PMC: 10938602. DOI: 10.1177/00469580241237117.


References
1.
Anton R, Randall C . Measurement and choice of drinking outcome variables in the COMBINE Study. J Stud Alcohol Suppl. 2005; (15):104-9. DOI: 10.15288/jsas.2005.s15.104. View

2.
Barrera Jr M, Chassin L, Rogosch F . Effects of social support and conflict on adolescent children of alcoholic and nonalcoholic fathers. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1993; 64(4):602-12. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.64.4.602. View

3.
. Testing combined pharmacotherapies and behavioral interventions in alcohol dependence: rationale and methods. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2003; 27(7):1107-22. DOI: 10.1097/00000374-200307000-00011. View

4.
Gibbs L, Flanagan J . Prognostic indicators of alcoholism treatment outcome. Int J Addict. 1977; 12(8):1097-1141. DOI: 10.3109/10826087709027273. View

5.
Jason L, Davis M, Ferrari J . The need for substance abuse after-care: longitudinal analysis of Oxford House. Addict Behav. 2006; 32(4):803-18. DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.06.014. View