» Articles » PMID: 20941647

What is the Role of Serological Testing Between Stages of Two-stage Reconstruction of the Infected Prosthetic Knee?

Overview
Publisher Wolters Kluwer
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2010 Oct 14
PMID 20941647
Citations 66
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Two-stage exchange arthroplasty is the gold standard for treatment of infected TKA. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), and synovial fluid white blood cell (WBC) count with differential are often used to determine treatment response; however, it is unclear whether these tests can answer the critical question of whether joint sepsis has been controlled between stages and if reimplantation is indicated.

Questions/purposes: We therefore asked if (1) these serologies respond between stage one explantation and stage two reimplantation during two-stage knee reconstruction for infection; and (2) changes in the values of these serologies are predictive of resolution of joint infection.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the serologies of 76 infected patients treated with a two-stage exchange protocol. The ESR, CRP, and aspiration were repeated a minimum of 2 weeks following antibiotic cessation and prior to second stage reoperation. Comparisons were made to identify trends in these serologies between the first and second stage procedures.

Results: Eight knees (12%) were persistently infected at the time of second stage reoperation. The ESR remained persistently elevated in 37 knees (54%), and the CRP remained elevated in 14 knees (21%) where infection had been controlled. We were unable to identify an optimum cutoff value for the ESR, CRP, or the two combined. The best test for confirmation of infection control was the synovial fluid WBC count.

Conclusions: Although the ESR, CRP, and synovial fluid WBC counts decreased in cases of infection control, these values frequently remained elevated. We were unable to identify any patterns in these tests indicative of persistent infection.

Level Of Evidence: Level II, diagnostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Citing Articles

Predictive Factors for Risk of Reinfection in Septic Two-Stage Revision of Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasties.

Blersch B, Sax F, Schuster P, Fink B Antibiotics (Basel). 2025; 14(2).

PMID: 40001411 PMC: 11851527. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics14020167.


Analysis of Serum and Synovial Inflammatory Markers in Periprosthetic Joint Infections: A Narrative Review.

Yadav A, Murhekar S, Cinar E Cureus. 2024; 16(11):e72821.

PMID: 39493345 PMC: 11528397. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.72821.


Upcoming evidence in clinical practice of two-stage revision arthroplasty for prosthetic joint infection.

Ascione T, Balato G, Pagliano P J Orthop Traumatol. 2024; 25(1):26.

PMID: 38761247 PMC: 11102413. DOI: 10.1186/s10195-024-00767-1.


A case report on Mycobacterium houstonense infection after total hip arthroplasty.

Li Z, Yuan Z, Cao H, Huan D, Qiu Y, Xia T BMC Infect Dis. 2023; 23(1):722.

PMID: 37880617 PMC: 10598912. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-023-08705-y.


Factors Influencing the Clinical Outcomes of Two-Stage Re-Implantation in Patients With Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Senel A, Ozturkmen Y, Eren M, Carkci E, Circi E, Kanay E Cureus. 2023; 15(7):e42566.

PMID: 37637597 PMC: 10460261. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.42566.


References
1.
Meek R, Masri B, Dunlop D, Garbuz D, Greidanus N, McGraw R . Patient satisfaction and functional status after treatment of infection at the site of a total knee arthroplasty with use of the PROSTALAC articulating spacer. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003; 85(10):1888-92. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200310000-00004. View

2.
Feldman D, Lonner J, Desai P, Zuckerman J . The role of intraoperative frozen sections in revision total joint arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995; 77(12):1807-13. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199512000-00003. View

3.
Della Valle C, Sporer S, Jacobs J, Berger R, Rosenberg A, Paprosky W . Preoperative testing for sepsis before revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2007; 22(6 Suppl 2):90-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.04.013. View

4.
Hanssen A, Spangehl M . Practical applications of antibiotic-loaded bone cement for treatment of infected joint replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004; (427):79-85. DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000143806.72379.7d. View

5.
Schinsky M, Della Valle C, Sporer S, Paprosky W . Perioperative testing for joint infection in patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90(9):1869-75. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01255. View