» Articles » PMID: 20941494

Comparison of Pre-operative DGEMRIC Imaging with Intra-operative Findings in Femoroacetabular Impingement: Preliminary Findings

Overview
Journal Skeletal Radiol
Specialties Orthopedics
Radiology
Date 2010 Oct 14
PMID 20941494
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To study standard MRI and dGEMRIC in patients with symptomatic FAI undergoing surgical intervention and compare them with intra-operative findings to see if they were corroborative.

Methods: Sixteen patients with symptomatic FAI that warranted surgical intervention were prospectively studied. All patients underwent plain radiographic series for FAI assessment followed by standard MRI and dGEMRIC. Subsequently, patients were surgically treated with safe dislocation and the joint was evaluated for any macroscopic signs of damaged cartilage. Data were statistically analyzed.

Results: A total of 224 zones in 16 patients were evaluated. One hundred and sixteen zones were intra-operatively rated as normal with mean T1 values of 510.1 ms ± 141.2 ms. Eighty zones had evidence of damage with mean T1 values of 453.1 ms ± 113.6 ms. The difference in these T1 values was significant (p = 0.003). Correlation between standard MRI and intra-operative findings was moderate (r = 0.535, p < 0.001). Intra-operative findings revealed more damage than standard MRI. On standard MRI, 68.6% zones were graded normal while 31.4% had evidence of damage. On intra-operative visualization, 56.4% zones were graded normal and 43.6% had evidence of damage. Correlation between dGEMRIC and intra-operative findings turned out to be weak (r = 0.114, p < 0.126). On T1 assessment 31.4% of zones were graded as normal and 68.6% as damaged.

Conclusions: dGEMRIC was significantly different between normal and affected cartilage based on intra-operative assessment. The correlation for morphological findings was limited, underestimating defects. By combining morphological with biochemical assessment dGEMRIC may play some role in the future to prognosticate outcomes and facilitate surgical planning and intervention.

Citing Articles

Correlation of Delayed Gadolinium-Enhanced MRI of Cartilage (dGEMRIC) Value With Hip Arthroscopy Intraoperative Findings and Midterm Periacetabular Osteotomy Outcomes.

Lee J, Houck D, Gruizinga B, Garabekyan T, Jesse M, Kraeutler M Orthop J Sports Med. 2022; 10(9):23259671221117606.

PMID: 36081408 PMC: 9445473. DOI: 10.1177/23259671221117606.


Insurance Coverage Criteria for Femoroacetabular Impingement Surgery: Are They Responding to Improving Evidence?.

Block A, Minaie A, Ross J, Clohisy J, Nepple J Iowa Orthop J. 2021; 41(1):145-154.

PMID: 34552417 PMC: 8259176.


Validity of direct magnetic resonance arthrogram in patients with femoroacetabular impingement and their outcome post hip arthroscopy.

Mohan R, Unnikrishnan P, Gudena R J Orthop. 2020; 18:204-208.

PMID: 32055144 PMC: 7005474. DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2019.11.003.


T2*-Mapping of Acetabular Cartilage in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement at 3 Tesla: Comparative Analysis with Arthroscopic Findings.

Hesper T, Neugroda C, Schleich C, Antoch G, Hosalkar H, Krauspe R Cartilage. 2017; 9(2):118-126.

PMID: 29126367 PMC: 5871124. DOI: 10.1177/1947603517741168.


Accuracy of magnetic resonance studies in the detection of chondral and labral lesions in femoroacetabular impingement: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Saied A, Redant C, El-Batouty M, El-Lakkany M, El-Adl W, Anthonissen J BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017; 18(1):83.

PMID: 28209142 PMC: 5314626. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-017-1443-2.


References
1.
Wagner S, Hofstetter W, Chiquet M, Mainil-Varlet P, Stauffer E, Ganz R . Early osteoarthritic changes of human femoral head cartilage subsequent to femoro-acetabular impingement. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2003; 11(7):508-18. DOI: 10.1016/s1063-4584(03)00075-x. View

2.
Beck M, Leunig M, Parvizi J, Boutier V, Wyss D, Ganz R . Anterior femoroacetabular impingement: part II. Midterm results of surgical treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004; (418):67-73. View

3.
Buckwalter J, Roughley P, Rosenberg L . Age-related changes in cartilage proteoglycans: quantitative electron microscopic studies. Microsc Res Tech. 1994; 28(5):398-408. DOI: 10.1002/jemt.1070280506. View

4.
Petersilge C . MR arthrography for evaluation of the acetabular labrum. Skeletal Radiol. 2001; 30(8):423-30. DOI: 10.1007/s002560100386. View

5.
Schmid M, Notzli H, Zanetti M, Wyss T, Hodler J . Cartilage lesions in the hip: diagnostic effectiveness of MR arthrography. Radiology. 2003; 226(2):382-6. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2262020019. View