Axial and Torsional Stability of Supracondylar Femur Osteotomies: Biomechanical Comparison of the Stability of Five Different Plate and Osteotomy Configurations

Overview

Journal Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc

Publisher Wiley

Specialties Emergency Medicine
General Surgery
Orthopedics

Date 2010 Oct 13

PMID 20938642

Citations 28

Authors

J-M Brinkman

C Hurschler

J D Agneskirchner

D Freiling

R J van Heerwaarden

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: Little is known regarding the biomechanical stability and stiffness of implants and techniques used in supracondylar femur osteotomies (SCO). Therefore, fixation stability and stiffness of implants to bone was investigated under simulated physiological loading conditions using a composite femur model and a 3D motion-analysis system.

Methods: Five osteotomy configurations were investigated: (1) oblique medial closing-wedge fixated with an angle-stable implant; (2) oblique and (3) perpendicular medial closing-wedge, both fixated with an angled blade plate; and lateral opening-wedge fixated with (4) a spacer plate and (5) an angle-stable lateral implant. The motion measured at the osteotomy was used to calculate the stiffness and stability of the constructs.

Results: The least amount of motion and highest stiffness was measured in the medial oblique closing-wedge osteotomy fixated with the angled blade plate. The lateral opening-wedge techniques were less stable and had a lower stiffness compared with the medial; the oblique saw cuts were more stable and had a higher stiffness than the perpendicular.

Conclusion: This experimental study presents baseline data on the differences in the primary stability of bone-implant constructs used in SCO. The data in this study can be used as reference for future testing of SCO techniques. Furthermore, it is recommended that based on the differences found, the early postoperative rehabilitation protocol is tailored to the stability and stiffness of the fixation method used.

Citing Articles

Medial open wedge osteotomy yields comparable stability to lateral open wedge procedure on the distal femur.

Karkosch R, Schwarze M, Smith T, Petri M, Pastor M, Horstmann H PLoS One. 2024; 19(9):e0310869.

PMID: 39321195 PMC: 11423964. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310869.

Simultaneous Osteosynthesis and Distal Femoral Osteotomy in a Patient With Distal Femoral Fracture Combined With Valgus Knee Deformity: A Case Report.

Fujita K, Fujita K, Kamata D, Yasutake H, Demura S Cureus. 2024; 16(7):e65006.

PMID: 39161518 PMC: 11333089. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.65006.

Comparison of double chevron-cut and biplanar distal femoral osteotomy techniques: A biomechanical study.

Chen K, Hsiung W, Wang C, Lee O, Huang K, Huang Y PLoS One. 2024; 19(4):e0296300.

PMID: 38635518 PMC: 11025861. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296300.

Wedgeless V-Shaped Osteotomy of the Distal Medial Femur with Locking Plate Fixation for Correction of Genu Valgum in Adolescents and Young Adults.

Arora S, Garg R, Sharma M, Bajaj V, Kashyap A, Gupta V JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2024; 13(4).

PMID: 38357469 PMC: 10863942. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.22.00033.

Optimal additional support screw position for prevention of hinge fracture in biplanar closed wedge distal femoral osteotomy.

Higa M, Nakayama H, Kanto R, Onishi S, Yoshiya S, Tachibana T J Orthop. 2023; 43:1-5.

PMID: 37521950 PMC: 10382836. DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2023.07.017.

References

Heiner A, Brown T . Structural properties of a new design of composite replicate femurs and tibias. J Biomech. 2001; 34(6):773-81. DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(01)00015-x. View

Luo C . Reference axes for reconstruction of the knee. Knee. 2004; 11(4):251-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2004.03.003. View

Firoozbakhsh K, Behzadi K, DeCoster T, Moneim M, Naraghi F . Mechanics of retrograde nail versus plate fixation for supracondylar femur fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 1995; 9(2):152-7. DOI: 10.1097/00005131-199504000-00011. View

Learmonth I . A simple technique for varus supracondylar osteotomy in genu valgum. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990; 72(2):235-7. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.72B2.2312562. View

Staubli A, De Simoni C, Babst R, Lobenhoffer P . TomoFix: a new LCP-concept for open wedge osteotomy of the medial proximal tibia--early results in 92 cases. Injury. 2003; 34 Suppl 2:B55-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2003.09.025. View

Stahelin T, Hardegger F, Ward J . Supracondylar osteotomy of the femur with use of compression. Osteosynthesis with a malleable implant. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000; 82(5):712-22. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200005000-00012. View

Zlowodzki M, Williamson S, Cole P, Zardiackas L, Kregor P . Biomechanical evaluation of the less invasive stabilization system, angled blade plate, and retrograde intramedullary nail for the internal fixation of distal femur fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2004; 18(8):494-502. DOI: 10.1097/00005131-200409000-00004. View

Hsu R, Himeno S, COVENTRY M, Chao E . Normal axial alignment of the lower extremity and load-bearing distribution at the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990; (255):215-27. View

Brinkman J, Lobenhoffer P, Agneskirchner J, Staubli A, Wymenga A, van Heerwaarden R . Osteotomies around the knee: patient selection, stability of fixation and bone healing in high tibial osteotomies. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008; 90(12):1548-57. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B12.21198. View

10.

Cusick R, Lucas G, McQueen D, GRABER C . Construct stiffness of different fixation methods for supracondylar femoral fractures above total knee prostheses. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2000; 29(9):695-9. View

11.

Stoffel K, Stachowiak G, Kuster M . Open wedge high tibial osteotomy: biomechanical investigation of the modified Arthrex Osteotomy Plate (Puddu Plate) and the TomoFix Plate. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2004; 19(9):944-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2004.06.007. View

12.

McDermott A, Finklestein J, Farine I, Boynton E, MacIntosh D, Gross A . Distal femoral varus osteotomy for valgus deformity of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988; 70(1):110-6. View

13.

Wagner M . General principles for the clinical use of the LCP. Injury. 2003; 34 Suppl 2:B31-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2003.09.023. View

14.

Stahelin T, Hardegger F . [Incomplete, supracondylar femur osteotomy. A minimally invasive compression osteosynthesis with soft implant]. Orthopade. 2004; 33(2):178-84. DOI: 10.1007/s00132-003-0589-9. View

15.

Frigg R . Development of the Locking Compression Plate. Injury. 2003; 34 Suppl 2:B6-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2003.09.020. View

16.

Stoffel K, Dieter U, Stachowiak G, Gachter A, Kuster M . Biomechanical testing of the LCP--how can stability in locked internal fixators be controlled?. Injury. 2003; 34 Suppl 2:B11-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2003.09.021. View

17.

Franco V, Cipolla M, Gerullo G, Gianni E, Puddu G . [Open wedge osteotomy of the distal femur in the valgus knee]. Orthopade. 2004; 33(2):185-92. DOI: 10.1007/s00132-003-0597-9. View

18.

Agneskirchner J, Freiling D, Hurschler C, Lobenhoffer P . Primary stability of four different implants for opening wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005; 14(3):291-300. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-005-0690-1. View

19.

Dvir Z, Prushansky T . Reproducibility and instrument validity of a new ultrasonography-based system for measuring cervical spine kinematics. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2000; 15(9):658-64. DOI: 10.1016/s0268-0033(00)00033-4. View

20.

Walsh J, Quinlan J, Stapleton R, FitzPatrick D, McCormack D . Three-dimensional motion analysis of the lumbar spine during "free squat" weight lift training. Am J Sports Med. 2007; 35(6):927-32. DOI: 10.1177/0363546506298276. View