» Articles » PMID: 20926763

Gut T1R3 Sweet Taste Receptors Do Not Mediate Sucrose-conditioned Flavor Preferences in Mice

Overview
Specialty Physiology
Date 2010 Oct 8
PMID 20926763
Citations 61
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Most mammals prefer the sweet taste of sugars, which is mediated by the heterodimeric T1R2+T1R3 taste receptor. Sugar appetite is also enhanced by the post-oral reinforcing actions of the nutrient in the gut. Here, we examined the contribution of gut T1R3 (either alone or as part of the T1R3+T1R3 receptor) to post-oral sugar reinforcement using a flavor-conditioning paradigm. We trained mice to associate consumption of a flavored solution (CS+) with intragastric (IG) infusions of a sweetener, and a different flavored solution (CS-) with IG infusions of water (23 h/day); then, we measured preference in a CS+ vs. CS- choice test. In experiment 1, we predicted that if activation of gut T1R3 mediates sugar reinforcement, then IG infusions of a nutritive (sucrose) or nonnutritive (sucralose) ligand for this receptor should condition a preference for the CS+ in B6 wild-type (WT) mice. While the mice that received IG sucrose infusions developed a strong preference for the CS+, those that received IG sucralose infusions developed a weak avoidance of the CS+. In experiment 2, we used T1R3 knockout (KO) mice to examine the necessity of gut T1R2+T1R3 receptors for conditioned flavor preferences. If intact gut T1R3 (or T1R2+T1R3) receptors are necessary for flavor-sugar conditioning, then T1R3 KO mice should not develop a sugar-conditioned flavor preference. We found that T1R3 KO mice, like WT mice, acquired a strong preference for the CS+ paired with IG sucrose infusions. The KO mice were also like WT mice in avoiding a CS+ flavor paired with IG sucralose infusions These findings provide clear evidence that gut T1R3 receptors are not necessary for sugar-conditioned flavor preferences or sucralose-induced flavor avoidance in mice.

Citing Articles

Mechanisms and Functions of Sweet Reception in Oral and Extraoral Organs.

Yoshida R, Ninomiya Y Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(13).

PMID: 39000505 PMC: 11242429. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25137398.


Glucose appetition in C57BL/6J mice: Influence of nonnutritive sweetener experience, food deprivation state and sex differences.

Sclafani A, Ackroff K Physiol Behav. 2024; 283:114596.

PMID: 38815713 PMC: 11246822. DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2024.114596.


The neural basis of sugar preference.

Liu W, Bohorquez D Nat Rev Neurosci. 2022; 23(10):584-595.

PMID: 35879409 PMC: 9886228. DOI: 10.1038/s41583-022-00613-5.


Post-oral sensing of fat increases food intake and attenuates body weight defense.

Gallop M, Wilson V, Ferrante Jr A Cell Rep. 2021; 37(3):109845.

PMID: 34686319 PMC: 8609494. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109845.


Learning of food preferences: mechanisms and implications for obesity & metabolic diseases.

Berthoud H, Morrison C, Ackroff K, Sclafani A Int J Obes (Lond). 2021; 45(10):2156-2168.

PMID: 34230576 PMC: 8455326. DOI: 10.1038/s41366-021-00894-3.


References
1.
Margolskee R, Dyer J, Kokrashvili Z, Salmon K, Ilegems E, Daly K . T1R3 and gustducin in gut sense sugars to regulate expression of Na+-glucose cotransporter 1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104(38):15075-80. PMC: 1986615. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0706678104. View

2.
Drucker D, Sclafani A . The role of gastric and postgastric sites in glucose-conditioned flavor preferences in rats. Physiol Behav. 1997; 61(2):351-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0031-9384(96)00414-3. View

3.
Damak S, Rong M, Yasumatsu K, Kokrashvili Z, Perez C, Shigemura N . Trpm5 null mice respond to bitter, sweet, and umami compounds. Chem Senses. 2006; 31(3):253-64. DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjj027. View

4.
Li X, Staszewski L, Xu H, Durick K, Zoller M, Adler E . Human receptors for sweet and umami taste. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99(7):4692-6. PMC: 123709. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.072090199. View

5.
Kokrashvili Z, Mosinger B, Margolskee R . T1r3 and alpha-gustducin in gut regulate secretion of glucagon-like peptide-1. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009; 1170:91-4. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04485.x. View