» Articles » PMID: 20888958

Resolution Measures in Molecular Electron Microscopy

Overview
Journal Methods Enzymol
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2010 Oct 5
PMID 20888958
Citations 51
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Resolution measures in molecular electron microscopy provide means to evaluate quality of macromolecular structures computed from sets of their two-dimensional (2D) line projections. When the amount of detail in the computed density map is low there are no external standards by which the resolution of the result can be judged. Instead, resolution measures in molecular electron microscopy evaluate consistency of the results in reciprocal space and present it as a one-dimensional (1D) function of the modulus of spatial frequency. Here we provide description of standard resolution measures commonly used in electron microscopy. We point out that the organizing principle is the relationship between these measures and the spectral signal-to-noise ratio (SSNR) of the computed density map. Within this framework it becomes straightforward to describe the connection between the outcome of resolution evaluations and the quality of electron microscopy maps, in particular, the optimum filtration, in the Wiener sense, of the computed map. We also provide a discussion of practical difficulties of evaluation of resolution in electron microscopy, particularly in terms of its sensitivity to data processing operations used during structure determination process in single particle analysis and in electron tomography (ET).

Citing Articles

A review of metal-organic frameworks and polymers in mixed matrix membranes for CO capture.

Christensen C, Hansen N, Motadayen M, Lock N, Henriksen M, Quinson J Beilstein J Nanotechnol. 2025; 16:155-186.

PMID: 39968168 PMC: 11833178. DOI: 10.3762/bjnano.16.14.


Microscopy Analysis of Autophagosomal Structures in Plant Cells.

Chung K, Law K, Zhuang X Methods Mol Biol. 2024; 2841:189-197.

PMID: 39115778 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-4059-3_18.


Unveiling Nanoparticles: Recent Approaches in Studying the Internalization Pattern of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles in Mono- and Multicellular Biological Structures.

Petcov T, Straticiuc M, Iancu D, Mirea D, Trusca R, Mereuta P J Funct Biomater. 2024; 15(6).

PMID: 38921542 PMC: 11204647. DOI: 10.3390/jfb15060169.


Okapi-EM: A napari plugin for processing and analyzing cryogenic serial focused ion beam/scanning electron microscopy images.

Perdigao L, Ho E, Cheng Z, Yee N, Glen T, Wu L Biol Imaging. 2024; 3:e9.

PMID: 38487692 PMC: 10936406. DOI: 10.1017/S2633903X23000119.


DeepETPicker: Fast and accurate 3D particle picking for cryo-electron tomography using weakly supervised deep learning.

Liu G, Niu T, Qiu M, Zhu Y, Sun F, Yang G Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):2090.

PMID: 38453943 PMC: 11258139. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-46041-0.


References
1.
Frank J, Verschoor A, Boublik M . Computer averaging of electron micrographs of 40S ribosomal subunits. Science. 1981; 214(4527):1353-5. DOI: 10.1126/science.7313694. View

2.
Zhang W, Kimmel M, Spahn C, Penczek P . Heterogeneity of large macromolecular complexes revealed by 3D cryo-EM variance analysis. Structure. 2008; 16(12):1770-6. PMC: 2642923. DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2008.10.011. View

3.
Saad A, Ludtke S, Jakana J, Rixon F, Tsuruta H, Chiu W . Fourier amplitude decay of electron cryomicroscopic images of single particles and effects on structure determination. J Struct Biol. 2001; 133(1):32-42. DOI: 10.1006/jsbi.2001.4330. View

4.
Grigorieff N . Resolution measurement in structures derived from single particles. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2000; 56(Pt 10):1270-7. DOI: 10.1107/s0907444900009549. View

5.
Saxton W, Baumeister W . The correlation averaging of a regularly arranged bacterial cell envelope protein. J Microsc. 1982; 127(Pt 2):127-38. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1982.tb00405.x. View