» Articles » PMID: 20888256

Results of HeartMate II Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation on Renal Function in Patients Requiring Post-implant Renal Replacement Therapy

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2010 Oct 5
PMID 20888256
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Renal function is often compromised in patients with advanced heart failure.

Methods: We evaluated renal function in heart failure patients supported by the HeartMate II (Thoratec Corporation, Pleasanton, CA) continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD) who required renal replacement therapy (RRT) by continuous venovenous hemofiltration dialysis (CVVHD) or hemodialysis, or both. Indications for RRT included oliguria (urine < 400 ml/day) unresponsive to diuretic therapy for > 24 hours with a creatinine level > 2.0 mg/dl or 1.5 times that of the pre-implant creatinine level, severe acidemia, and volume overload.

Results: Of 107 consecutive patients who underwent HeartMate II implantation at our center and had been supported for > 30 days, 15 (13 men and 2 women) required post-implant RRT. Of the 15 patients, 3 received CVVHD and 12 received CVVHD and hemodialysis. Renal function improved within 2 months of support compared with average values before support (creatinine clearance, 64 ± 39 vs 92 ± 55 ml/min, p = 0.041; glomerular filtration rate, 46.9 ± 20.7 vs 73.2 ± 38.9 ml/min/1.73 m(2); p = 0.032). Renal function improved after HeartMate II implantation in 10 patients, and RRT was removed. Of these 10 patients, 2 underwent heart transplantation 4 months after RRT was removed, 1 underwent heart and kidney transplantation 4 years later, 2 died at home of conditions unrelated to renal function 6 months after RRT was removed, and 5 are awaiting heart transplantation, with good quality of life.

Conclusions: In this study, patients who experienced clinical recovery after the LVAD implant had subsequent recovery of renal function after continuous-flow LVAD support.

Citing Articles

Outcomes of HeartMate 3 in pediatric patients with end-stage heart failure: a single-center preliminary experience from Turkey.

Dogan E, Tutar Z, Tuncer O, Levent R, Engin C, Yagdi T Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 11:1472663.

PMID: 39469126 PMC: 11513339. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1472663.


Long-term kidney outcomes in pediatric continuous-flow ventricular assist device patients.

Idrovo A, Hollander S, Neumayr T, Bell C, Munoz G, Choudhry S Pediatr Nephrol. 2023; 39(4):1289-1300.

PMID: 37971519 DOI: 10.1007/s00467-023-06190-8.


Outcomes With Left Ventricular Assist Device in End-Stage Renal Disease: A Systematic Review.

Lakhdar S, Nassar M, Buttar C, Guzman Perez L, Akbar S, Zafar A Cureus. 2022; 14(4):e24227.

PMID: 35602813 PMC: 9117860. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.24227.


Risk factors of renal replacement therapy after heart transplantation: a retrospective single-center study.

Xie B, Fu L, Wu Y, Xie X, Zhang W, Hou J Ann Transl Med. 2022; 10(5):257.

PMID: 35402585 PMC: 8987878. DOI: 10.21037/atm-22-541.


Successful Use of Arteriovenous Graft for Hemodialysis Access After Left Ventricular Assist Device Placement.

Toma K, Stevens J, Morrissey N, Yuzefpolskaya M, Radhakrishnan J, Ali Husain S Kidney Med. 2021; 3(6):1091-1094.

PMID: 34939019 PMC: 8664732. DOI: 10.1016/j.xkme.2021.07.004.