Comprehensive Validation of the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale

Overview

Journal Gastrointest Endosc

Specialties Gastroenterology
Pharmacology
Radiology

Date 2010 Oct 2

PMID 20883845

Citations 145

Authors

Audrey H Calderwood

Brian C Jacobson

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: The Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) is a novel bowel cleanliness rating scale that has undergone partial validation previously.

Objective: To fully validate the BBPS and assess the ease of its dissemination.

Design: Observational study.

Setting: Various endoscopy units worldwide.

Subjects: Endoscopists.

Methods: Video recordings of colonoscopies with varying degrees of cleanliness were viewed twice by gastroenterologists at 1 medical center. For each video, participants assigned segment and total BBPS scores. Endoscopists worldwide were also surveyed about their experience with the BBPS after viewing an instructional video.

Main Outcome Measurements: Intraclass correlation coefficients and weighted κ values assessed inter- and intrarater reliability, respectively. The BBPS was used among 983 patients undergoing screening colonoscopy.

Results: The BBPS demonstrated near-perfect interrater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.91) and substantial intrarater reliability (weighted κ = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.73-0.84). Among 983 colonoscopies, right and left colon segment scores of 2 or 3 had a multivariate odds ratio of 1.60 (95% CI, 1.01-2.55) and 2.58 (95% CI, 1.34-4.98), respectively, for polyp detection compared with segment scores of 0 or 1. Endoscopists from a variety of settings worldwide found the BBPS easy to implement and applicable to their patient population.

Limitations: Single-center reliability testing.

Conclusions: The BBPS is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing bowel cleanliness during colonoscopy. Segment scores may represent a standardized way to determine bowel preparation adequacy. The BBPS can be easily disseminated through the use of a brief instructional video.

Citing Articles

Bowel Cleansing Effectiveness of Sulfate-Based Tablet Versus Sulfate-Based Solution for Outpatient Colonoscopy: A Retrospective Noninferiority Study.

Moein H, Karimian B, Edwards T, Seisa M, Kendziorski J, Patel R Dig Dis Sci. 2025; .

PMID: 40087241 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-025-08975-3.

Applying machine learning to predict bowel preparation adequacy in elderly patients for colonoscopy: development and validation of a web-based prediction tool.

Liu J, Jiang W, Yu Y, Gong J, Chen G, Yang Y Ann Med. 2025; 57(1):2474172.

PMID: 40065741 PMC: 11899208. DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2474172.

Auricular acupressure for minimizing adverse reactions to colonoscopic bowel preparation in hospitalized patients: A randomized controlled trial.

Zhang J, Liu C, Ruan G, Zhang H, Zhang B, Hu X Heliyon. 2025; 11(3):e42187.

PMID: 39995905 PMC: 11848087. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42187.

Efficacy of Probiotic in the Bowel Preparation Regimen of Children Candidates for Colonoscopy.

Rahmani P, Ebrahimi M, Rohani P, Sohouli M, Magalhaes E JGH Open. 2025; 9(2):e70119.

PMID: 39963127 PMC: 11831066. DOI: 10.1002/jgh3.70119.

International Validation of a Novel PEACE Scale to Improve the Quality of Upper Gastrointestinal Mucosal Inspection During Endoscopy.

Romanczyk M, Desai M, Kaminski M, Abe S, Alkandari A, Beyna T Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2025; 16(1):e00786.

PMID: 39853720 PMC: 11756887. DOI: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000786.

References

Lai E, Calderwood A, Doros G, Fix O, Jacobson B . The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009; 69(3 Pt 2):620-5. PMC: 2763922. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.05.057. View

Giraudeau B, Mary J . Planning a reproducibility study: how many subjects and how many replicates per subject for an expected width of the 95 per cent confidence interval of the intraclass correlation coefficient. Stat Med. 2001; 20(21):3205-14. DOI: 10.1002/sim.935. View

Borg B, Gupta N, Zuckerman G, Banerjee B, Gyawali C . Impact of obesity on bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009; 7(6):670-5. PMC: 4151157. DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2009.02.014. View

Shrout P, Fleiss J . Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979; 86(2):420-8. DOI: 10.1037//0033-2909.86.2.420. View

Calderwood A, Lai E, Fix O, Jacobson B . An endoscopist-blinded, randomized, controlled trial of a simple visual aid to improve bowel preparation for screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 73(2):307-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.10.013. View

Rostom A, Jolicoeur E . Validation of a new scale for the assessment of bowel preparation quality. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004; 59(4):482-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(03)02875-x. View

Ness R, Manam R, Hoen H, Chalasani N . Predictors of inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001; 96(6):1797-802. DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03874.x. View

Leung J, Mann S, Siao-Salera R, Ransibrahmanakul K, Lim B, Cabrera H . A randomized, controlled comparison of warm water infusion in lieu of air insufflation versus air insufflation for aiding colonoscopy insertion in sedated patients undergoing colorectal cancer screening and surveillance. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009; 70(3):505-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.12.253. View

Rex D, Petrini J, Baron T, Chak A, Cohen J, Deal S . Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006; 101(4):873-85. DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00673.x. View

10.

Lakoff J, Paszat L, Saskin R, Rabeneck L . Risk of developing proximal versus distal colorectal cancer after a negative colonoscopy: a population-based study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008; 6(10):1117-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2008.05.016. View

11.

Karanicolas P, Bhandari M, Kreder H, Moroni A, Richardson M, Walter S . Evaluating agreement: conducting a reliability study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009; 91 Suppl 3:99-106. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01624. View

12.

Aronchick C, Lipshutz W, Wright S, Dufrayne F, Bergman G . A novel tableted purgative for colonoscopic preparation: efficacy and safety comparisons with Colyte and Fleet Phospho-Soda. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000; 52(3):346-52. DOI: 10.1067/mge.2000.108480. View

13.

Lebwohl B, Wang T, Neugut A . Socioeconomic and other predictors of colonoscopy preparation quality. Dig Dis Sci. 2010; 55(7):2014-20. DOI: 10.1007/s10620-009-1079-7. View

14.

Brenner H, Hoffmeister M, Arndt V, Stegmaier C, Altenhofen L, Haug U . Protection from right- and left-sided colorectal neoplasms after colonoscopy: population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010; 102(2):89-95. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djp436. View

15.

Baxter N, Goldwasser M, Paszat L, Saskin R, Urbach D, Rabeneck L . Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2008; 150(1):1-8. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-1-200901060-00306. View

16.

Landis J, Koch G . The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977; 33(1):159-74. View