» Articles » PMID: 20881116

Selectivity and Tolerance ("invariance") Both Increase As Visual Information Propagates from Cortical Area V4 to IT

Overview
Journal J Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 2010 Oct 1
PMID 20881116
Citations 175
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Our ability to recognize objects despite large changes in position, size, and context is achieved through computations that are thought to increase both the shape selectivity and the tolerance ("invariance") of the visual representation at successive stages of the ventral pathway [visual cortical areas V1, V2, and V4 and inferior temporal cortex (IT)]. However, these ideas have proven difficult to test. Here, we consider how well population activity patterns at two stages of the ventral stream (V4 and IT) discriminate between, and generalize across, different images. We found that both V4 and IT encode natural images with similar fidelity, whereas the IT population is much more sensitive to controlled, statistical scrambling of those images. Scrambling sensitivity was proportional to receptive field (RF) size in both V4 and IT, suggesting that, on average, the number of visual feature conjunctions implemented by a V4 or IT neuron is directly related to its RF size. We also found that the IT population could better discriminate between objects across changes in position, scale, and context, thus directly demonstrating a V4-to-IT gain in tolerance. This tolerance gain could be accounted for by both a decrease in single-unit sensitivity to identity-preserving transformations (e.g., an increase in RF size) and an increase in the maintenance of rank-order object selectivity within the RF. These results demonstrate that, as visual information travels from V4 to IT, the population representation is reformatted to become more selective for feature conjunctions and more tolerant to identity preserving transformations, and they reveal the single-unit response properties that underlie that reformatting.

Citing Articles

An image-computable model of speeded decision-making.

Jaffe P, Santiago-Reyes G, Schafer R, Bissett P, Poldrack R Elife. 2025; 13.

PMID: 40019474 PMC: 11870652. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.98351.


Neural sensitivity to radial frequency patterns in the visual cortex of developing macaques.

Deliz C, Lee G, Bushnell B, Majaj N, Movshon J, Kiorpes L bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39975154 PMC: 11838248. DOI: 10.1101/2025.01.27.634810.


Orthogonal neural representations support perceptual judgments of natural stimuli.

Srinath R, Ni A, Marucci C, Cohen M, Brainard D Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):5316.

PMID: 39939679 PMC: 11821992. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-88910-8.


Emergence of a contrast-invariant representation of naturalistic texture in macaque visual cortex.

Lee G, Majaj N, Deliz C, Kiorpes L, Movshon J bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39803474 PMC: 11722230. DOI: 10.1101/2025.01.03.631258.


Hippocampal Discoveries: Spatial View Cells, Connectivity, and Computations for Memory and Navigation, in Primates Including Humans.

Rolls E Hippocampus. 2024; 35(1):e23666.

PMID: 39690918 PMC: 11653063. DOI: 10.1002/hipo.23666.


References
1.
Hubel D, Wiesel T . RECEPTIVE FIELDS AND FUNCTIONAL ARCHITECTURE IN TWO NONSTRIATE VISUAL AREAS (18 AND 19) OF THE CAT. J Neurophysiol. 1965; 28:229-89. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1965.28.2.229. View

2.
Mysore S, Vogels R, Raiguel S, Orban G . Processing of kinetic boundaries in macaque V4. J Neurophysiol. 2005; 95(3):1864-80. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00627.2005. View

3.
Ito M, Tamura H, Fujita I, Tanaka K . Size and position invariance of neuronal responses in monkey inferotemporal cortex. J Neurophysiol. 1995; 73(1):218-26. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1995.73.1.218. View

4.
Mazer J, Vinje W, McDermott J, Schiller P, Gallant J . Spatial frequency and orientation tuning dynamics in area V1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99(3):1645-50. PMC: 122244. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.022638499. View

5.
Felleman D, Van Essen D . Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. Cereb Cortex. 1991; 1(1):1-47. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/1.1.1-a. View