New Brain Lesions After Carotid Revascularization Are Not Associated with Cognitive Performance
Overview
General Surgery
Authors
Affiliations
Purpose: Carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) is increasingly being used as a treatment alternative to endarterectomy (CEA) for patients with significant carotid stenosis. However, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) has indicated that CAS is associated with a significantly higher burden of microemboli. This study evaluated the potential effect on intellectual functions of new DWI lesions after CEA or CAS.
Methods: This prospective study analyzed the neuropsychologic outcomes after revascularization in 24 CAS and 31 CEA patients with severe carotid stenosis compared with a control group of 27 healthy individuals. All patients underwent clinical examinations, magnetic resonance imaging scans, and a neuropsychologic test battery that assessed six major cognitive domains performed immediately before CEA or CAS, ≤ 72 hours after, and at 3 months.
Results: New DWI lesions were detected among 15 of 21 (71%) of the CAS patients immediately after treatment but in only 1 of the 28 CEA patients (4%; P < .01). As a group, patients with new DWI lesions showed a decline in their performance in the cognitive domains, attention, and visuoconstructive functions within 72 hours of carotid revascularization. Individually, however, in none of the cognitive domains did the decreases reach a clinically relevant threshold of z < -1.5. Moreover, the cognitive performance was not significantly different between patients with and without new DWI lesions 3 months after treatment. The cognitive performance was similar between CEA and CAS patients at all points.
Conclusions: The findings support the assumption that new brain lesions, as detected with DWI after CAS or CEA, do not affect cognitive performance in a manner that is long-lasting or clinically relevant. Despite the higher embolic load detected by DWI, CAS is not associated with a greater cognitive decline than CEA.
Huang K, Ho M, Chang Y, Chang C, Liu C, Wu H Front Aging Neurosci. 2022; 13:732617.
PMID: 35095463 PMC: 8789655. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.732617.
Traenka C, Engelter S, Brown M, Dobson J, Frost C, Bonati L Eur Stroke J. 2019; 4(2):127-143.
PMID: 31259261 PMC: 6591767. DOI: 10.1177/2396987318824491.
Rosen A, Soman S, Bhat J, Laird A, Stephens J, Eickhoff S Neuroimage Clin. 2018; 18:553-559.
PMID: 29868451 PMC: 5984594. DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.01.020.
Zhou W, Baughman B, Soman S, Wintermark M, Lazzeroni L, Hitchner E J Vasc Surg. 2016; 65(3):686-694.
PMID: 28024850 PMC: 5328795. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.09.057.
Gait Patterns in Patients with Hereditary Spastic Paraparesis.
Serrao M, Rinaldi M, Ranavolo A, Lacquaniti F, Martino G, Leonardi L PLoS One. 2016; 11(10):e0164623.
PMID: 27732632 PMC: 5061421. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164623.