» Articles » PMID: 20869162

Biochemical Recurrence Following Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Analysis of 1384 Patients with a Median 5-year Follow-up

Overview
Journal Eur Urol
Specialty Urology
Date 2010 Sep 28
PMID 20869162
Citations 61
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: There is a paucity of data on long-term oncologic outcomes for patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) for prostate cancer (PCa).

Objective: To evaluate oncologic outcomes in patients undergoing RARP at a high-volume tertiary center, with a focus on 5-yr biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCRFS).

Design, Setting, And Participants: The study cohort consisted of 1384 consecutive patients with localized PCa who underwent RARP between September 2001 and May 2005 and had a median follow-up of 60.2 mo. No patient had secondary therapy until documented biochemical recurrence (BCR). BCR was defined as a serum prostate-specific antigen ≥ 0.2 ng/ml with a confirmatory value. BCRFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Event-time distributions for the time to failure were compared using the log-rank test. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to determine variables predictive of BCR.

Intervention: All patients underwent RARP.

Measurements: BCRFS rates were measured.

Results And Limitations: This cohort of patients had moderately aggressive PCa: 49.0% were D'Amico intermediate or high risk on biopsy; however, 60.9% had Gleason 7-10 disease, and 25.5% had ≥ T3 disease on final pathology. There were 189 incidences of BCR (31 per 1,000 person years of follow-up) at a median follow-up of 60.2 mo (interquartile range [IQR]: 37.2-69.7). The actuarial BCRFS was 95.1%, 90.6%, 86.6%, and 81.0% at 1, 3, 5, and 7 yr, respectively. In the patients who recurred, median time to BCR was 20.4 mo; 65% of BCR incidences occurred within 3 yr and 86.2% within 5 yr. On multivariable analysis, the strongest predictors of BCR were pathologic Gleason grade 8-10 (hazard ratio [HR]: 5.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.99-9.65; p < 0.0001) and pathologic stage T3b/T4 (HR: 2.71; 95% CI, 1.67-4.40; p < 0.0001).

Conclusions: In a contemporary cohort of patients with localized PCa, RARP confers effective 5-yr biochemical control.

Citing Articles

Development of risk-score model in patients with negative surgical margin after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Yamada Y, Fujii Y, Kakutani S, Kimura N, Sugimoto K, Hakozaki Y Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):7607.

PMID: 38556562 PMC: 10982299. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-58279-1.


Multivariate logistic regression analysis of the clinical factors influencing locally advanced prostate cancer.

Ke Z, Xu Y, Shu Y, Wang C, Wu B, Zhang B Transl Cancer Res. 2024; 13(2):676-685.

PMID: 38482405 PMC: 10928594. DOI: 10.21037/tcr-23-1680.


Prediction of biochemical recurrence after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Bejrananda T, Pliensiri P BMC Urol. 2023; 23(1):183.

PMID: 37953250 PMC: 10642024. DOI: 10.1186/s12894-023-01350-2.


Quadrifecta outcomes and their predictors following robotic radical prostatectomy: a study of newly established robotic center in India.

Aggarwal A, Singh M, Choudhary G, Singh V, Sandhu A, Bhirud D J Robot Surg. 2023; 17(5):2271-2277.

PMID: 37310526 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-023-01622-x.


Is It Safe to Switch from a Standard Anterior to Retzius-Sparing Approach in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy?.

Lambert E, Allaeys C, Berquin C, De Visschere P, Verbeke S, Vanneste B Curr Oncol. 2023; 30(3):3447-3460.

PMID: 36975474 PMC: 10047447. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30030261.