» Articles » PMID: 2086791

Audiovocal Interactions During Development? Vocalisation in Deafened Young Horseshoe Bats Vs. Audition in Vocalisation-impaired Bats

Overview
Date 1990 Dec 1
PMID 2086791
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Horseshoe bats (Rhinolophus rouxi) were deafened in their 3rd-5th postnatal week. Subsequently their vocalisations were monitored to evaluate the impact of audition on the development of echolocation pulses. Hearing impairment affected the echolocation pulses as follows: the frequency of the constant frequency (CF) component was altered by between +4 kHz and -14 kHz, and the dominance of the second harmonic of the pulses was neutralised by a relative increase in intensity of the first and third harmonics. A second experiment focused on possible influences of acoustical self-stimulation with echolocation pulses on the establishment of auditory fovea representation in the inferior colliculus (IC). Frequency control of echolocation pulses was disrupted by larynx denervation. Thereafter, the bats produced multiharmonic echolocation signals (4-11 harmonics) varying in frequency. IC tonotopy, however, as monitored by stereotaxic electrophysiology, showed the same developmental dynamics as seen in control specimens (Fig. 10). Both experiments indicate that throughout postnatal development echolocation pulses are under auditory feedback control, whereas maturation of the auditory fovea and shifts in its frequency tuning represent an innate process. The significance of this postnatal development might be the adjustment of the vocal motor system of each bat to the frequency of its 'personal' auditory fovea.

Citing Articles

Hearing, echolocation, and beam steering from day 0 in tongue-clicking bats.

Smarsh G, Tarnovsky Y, Yovel Y Proc Biol Sci. 2021; 288(1961):20211714.

PMID: 34702074 PMC: 8548796. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2021.1714.


Vocal production learning in mammals revisited.

Janik V, Knornschild M Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021; 376(1836):20200244.

PMID: 34482736 PMC: 8419569. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0244.


Behaviour, biology and evolution of vocal learning in bats.

Vernes S, Wilkinson G Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2019; 375(1789):20190061.

PMID: 31735153 PMC: 6895559. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0061.


Ultrasound Imaging Reveals Accelerated In-utero Development of a Sensory Apparatus in Echolocating Bats.

Amichai E, Tal S, Boonman A, Yovel Y Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):5275.

PMID: 30918299 PMC: 6437157. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-41715-y.


Different auditory feedback control for echolocation and communication in horseshoe bats.

Liu Y, Feng J, Metzner W PLoS One. 2013; 8(4):e62710.

PMID: 23638137 PMC: 3634746. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062710.


References
1.
Winter P, Handley P, PLOOG D, Schott D . Ontogeny of squirrel monkey calls under normal conditions and under acoustic isolation. Behaviour. 1973; 47(3):230-9. DOI: 10.1163/156853973x00085. View

2.
Rubsamen R . Ontogenesis of the echolocation system in the rufous horseshoe bat, Rhinolophus rouxi (audition and vocalization in early postnatal development). J Comp Physiol A. 1987; 161(6):899-904. DOI: 10.1007/BF00610231. View

3.
ROMAND R, Ehret G . Development of sound production in normal, isolated, and deafened kittens during the first postnatal months. Dev Psychobiol. 1984; 17(6):629-49. DOI: 10.1002/dev.420170606. View

4.
Rubsamen R, Schafer M . Ontogenesis of auditory fovea representation in the inferior colliculus of the Sri Lankan rufous horseshoe bat, Rhinolophus rouxi. J Comp Physiol A. 1990; 167(6):757-69. DOI: 10.1007/BF00189766. View

5.
Metzner W . A possible neuronal basis for Doppler-shift compensation in echo-locating horseshoe bats. Nature. 1989; 341(6242):529-32. DOI: 10.1038/341529a0. View