» Articles » PMID: 20858816

Cardiac CT for the Differentiation of Bicuspid and Tricuspid Aortic Valves: Comparison with Echocardiography and Surgery

Overview
Specialties Oncology
Radiology
Date 2010 Sep 23
PMID 20858816
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of CT, compared with that of echocardiography and surgery, for differentiating between bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves.

Materials And Methods: Forty-seven patients with bicuspid valve and 47 patients with tricuspid aortic valve underwent retrospectively ECG-gated dual-source CT and echocardiography. Thirty-four (72%) of the 47 patients with bicuspid aortic valve underwent valve surgery. Two independent blinded observers assessed the CT image quality of the aortic valve during diastole and systole on a 4-point scale, determined which phase allowed the differentiation of valve type, distinguished between tricuspid and bicuspid aortic valves, and assessed for the presence of a raphe. Diagnostic performance of CT was determined using echocardiography and surgery as the reference standard.

Results: According to echocardiography and surgery, seven (15%) of the 47 bicuspid aortic valves had no raphe, and 40 (85%) had a raphe. CT image quality was diagnostic (i.e., scores of 1-3) in all 94 patients in both diastole and systole. Among patients with bicuspid aortic valve and no raphe, differentiation between tricuspid and bicuspid aortic valves could be performed in diastole in 100% (7/7) of cases. Among patients with bicuspid aortic valve and raphe, differentiation was possible only in systole in 5% (2/40) of cases and when combining diastole and systole in 95% (38/40) of cases. In three bicuspid aortic valves with raphe, the valve was misclassified by CT as tricuspid aortic valve. Overall sensitivity and specificity of CT for the diagnosis of bicuspid aortic valve were 94% and 100%.

Conclusion: CT is highly accurate for differentiation between bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves. For bicuspid aortic valves without raphe, diastolic reconstructions are sufficient, whereas in those with a raphe, additional reconstructions in systole are required.

Citing Articles

Diagnosis of bicuspid aortic valves: CT vs. TTE.

Sylivris A, Liu Z, Theuerle J, Lim R Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024; .

PMID: 39652208 DOI: 10.1007/s10554-024-03290-w.


Patients with a Bicuspid Aortic Valve (BAV) Diagnosed with ECG-Gated Cardiac Multislice Computed Tomography-Analysis of the Reasons for Referral, Classification of Morphological Phenotypes, Co-Occurring Cardiovascular Abnormalities, and Coronary....

Machowiec P, Przybylski P, Czekajska-Chehab E, Drop A J Clin Med. 2024; 13(13).

PMID: 38999356 PMC: 11242148. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13133790.


Diagnostic Performance of Cardiac CT and Transthoracic Echocardiography for Detection of Surgically Confirmed Bicuspid Aortic Valve: Effect of Calcium Extent and Valve Subtypes.

Kim J, Kim S, Ahn J, Kim J, Choe Y J Korean Soc Radiol. 2023; 84(6):1324-1336.

PMID: 38107699 PMC: 10721418. DOI: 10.3348/jksr.2022.0170.


Advanced Cardiac Imaging in the Assessment of Aortic Stenosis.

Grodecki K, Warniello M, Spiewak M, Kwiecinski J J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023; 10(5).

PMID: 37233183 PMC: 10218881. DOI: 10.3390/jcdd10050216.


Different calcification patterns of tricuspid and bicuspid aortic valves and their clinical impact.

Gollmann-Tepekoylu C, Nagele F, Engler C, Stoessel L, Zellmer B, Graber M Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2022; 35(6).

PMID: 36383200 PMC: 10906007. DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivac274.