» Articles » PMID: 20858688

Efficacy of Doripenem in the Treatment of Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Experimental Pneumonia Versus Imipenem and Meropenem

Overview
Date 2010 Sep 23
PMID 20858688
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare doripenem with imipenem and meropenem in an experimental rabbit model of Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia and then to compare different doripenem doses and methods of intravenous administration.

Methods: Using a rabbit experimental model of pneumonia, efficacy was assessed following 2 days of treatment by colony counts of different tissues (lung, spleen and blood culture).

Results: Mean pulmonary bacterial loads were 3.17 ± 0.53, 3.42 ± 0.61 and 2.75 ± 0.59 log(10) cfu/g for imipenem, doripenem (0.5 g three times daily) and meropenem, respectively, compared with 7.57 ± 0.99 cfu/g for control animals. At a higher dose (1 g three times daily), doripenem showed significantly better efficacy (2.70 ± 0.65 log(10) cfu/g) than the standard regimen of doripenem. Sterilization of spleen cultures was achieved with standard regimens of imipenem (1 g three times daily) and a higher dose of doripenem.

Conclusions: In this model of P. aeruginosa pneumonia, doripenem had an efficacy equivalent to that of meropenem and imipenem at a high dose of 1 g three times a day and lower efficacy at a standard dose (0.5 g three times daily) than the other two agents in terms of bacteria cultivated from spleens. Doripenem is a new drug that offers new therapeutic options, especially for difficult-to-treat infections such as pneumonia due to non-fermenting Gram-negative bacteria.

Citing Articles

Carbapenem Combinations for Infections Caused by Carbapenemase-Producing : Experimental In Vitro and In Vivo Analysis.

Herrera-Espejo S, Barrio-Tofino E, Cebrero-Cangueiro T, Lopez-Causape C, Alvarez-Marin R, Cisneros J Antibiotics (Basel). 2022; 11(9).

PMID: 36139991 PMC: 9495166. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics11091212.


Assessment of Doripenem, Meropenem, and Imipenem against Respiratory Isolates of in a Tertiary Care Hospital of North India.

Negi A, Anand M, Singh A, Kumar A, Sahu C, Prasad K Indian J Crit Care Med. 2017; 21(10):703-706.

PMID: 29142383 PMC: 5672677. DOI: 10.4103/ijccm.IJCCM_341_17.


MIC score, a new tool to compare bacterial susceptibility to antibiotics application to the comparison of susceptibility to different penems of clinical strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Bretonniere C, Maitte A, Caillon J, Potel G, Boutoille D, Jacqueline C J Antibiot (Tokyo). 2016; 69(11):806-810.

PMID: 27025352 DOI: 10.1038/ja.2016.38.


Pharmacodynamic evaluation of the intracellular activity of antibiotics towards Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 in a model of THP-1 human monocytes.

Buyck J, Tulkens P, Van Bambeke F Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013; 57(5):2310-8.

PMID: 23478951 PMC: 3632903. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.02609-12.


Comparative pharmacodynamics and antimutant potentials of doripenem and imipenem with ciprofloxacin-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in an in vitro model.

Firsov A, Gilbert D, Greer K, Portnoy Y, Zinner S Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011; 56(3):1223-8.

PMID: 22203591 PMC: 3294888. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.05964-11.