» Articles » PMID: 20852744

The Assessment and Treatment of Prosodic Disorders and Neurological Theories of Prosody

Overview
Date 2010 Sep 21
PMID 20852744
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In this article, we comment on specific aspects of Peppé (Peppé, 2009). In particular, we address the assessment and treatment of prosody in clinical settings and discuss current theory on neurological models of prosody. We argue that in order for prosodic assessment instruments and treatment programs to be clinical effective, we need assessment instruments that: (1) have a representative normative comparison sample and strong psychometric properties; (2) are based on empirical information regarding the typical sequence of prosodic acquisition and are sensitive to developmental change; (3) meaningfully subcategorize various aspects of prosody; (4) use tasks that have ecological validity; and (5) have clinical properties, such as length and ease of administration, that allow them to become part of standard language assessment batteries. In addition, we argue that current theories of prosody processing in the brain are moving toward network models that involve multiple brain areas and are crucially dependent on cortical communication. The implications of these observations for future research and clinical practice are outlined.

Citing Articles

Acquisition of Speech Prosody in a Non-native Tone Language by Children With and Without Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Chen S, Zhang Y, Li M, Li B, Lu S, Chan A J Autism Dev Disord. 2025; .

PMID: 39776110 DOI: 10.1007/s10803-024-06698-4.


Perspectives of Speech-Language Pathologists on Prosodic Intervention in Children with Hearing Impairment.

Mathew A, Sreedevi N Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024; 76(6):5248-5255.

PMID: 39559104 PMC: 11569065. DOI: 10.1007/s12070-024-04956-6.


Focus-marking in a tonal language: Prosodic differences between Cantonese-speaking children with and without autism spectrum disorder.

Chen S, Zhang Y, Zhou F, Chan A, Li B, Li B PLoS One. 2024; 19(7):e0306272.

PMID: 39028710 PMC: 11259269. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306272.


Perception and adaptation of receptive prosody in autistic adolescents.

Kurumada C, Rivera R, Allen P, Bennetto L Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):16409.

PMID: 39013983 PMC: 11252140. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-66569-x.


Outcome measures for children with speech sound disorder: an umbrella review.

Harding S, Burr S, Cleland J, Stringer H, Wren Y BMJ Open. 2024; 14(4):e081446.

PMID: 38684261 PMC: 11086453. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081446.


References
1.
van Santen J, Prudhommeaux E, Black L . Automated Assessment of Prosody Production. Speech Commun. 2010; 51(11):1082-1097. PMC: 2753987. DOI: 10.1016/j.specom.2009.04.007. View

2.
Tanenhaus M, Eberhard K, Sedivy J . Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science. 1995; 268(5217):1632-4. DOI: 10.1126/science.7777863. View

3.
Lim H . Effect of "developmental speech and language training through music" on speech production in children with autism spectrum disorders. J Music Ther. 2010; 47(1):2-26. DOI: 10.1093/jmt/47.1.2. View

4.
Peppe S, McCann J . Assessing intonation and prosody in children with atypical language development: the PEPS-C test and the revised version. Clin Linguist Phon. 2003; 17(4-5):345-54. DOI: 10.1080/0269920031000079994. View

5.
Wells B, Peppe S . Intonation abilities of children with speech and language impairments. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2003; 46(1):5-20. DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2003/001). View