» Articles » PMID: 20848606

Recollection and Familiarity: Examining Controversial Assumptions and New Directions

Overview
Journal Hippocampus
Publisher Wiley
Date 2010 Sep 18
PMID 20848606
Citations 197
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

It is well accepted that recognition memory reflects the contribution of two separable memory retrieval processes, namely recollection and familiarity. However, fundamental questions remain regarding the functional nature and neural substrates of these processes. In this article, we describe a simple quantitative model of recognition memory (i.e., the dual-process signal detection model) that has been useful in integrating findings from a broad range of cognitive studies, and that is now being applied in a growing number of neuroscientific investigations of memory. The model makes several strong assumptions about the behavioral nature and neural substrates of recollection and familiarity. A review of the literature indicates that these assumptions are generally well supported, but that there are clear boundary conditions in which these assumptions break down. We argue that these findings provide important insights into the operation of the processes underlying recognition. Finally, we consider how the dual-process approach relates to recent neuroanatomical and computational models and how it might be integrated with recent findings concerning the role of medial temporal lobe regions in other cognitive functions such as novelty detection, perception, implicit memory and short-term memory.

Citing Articles

EEG-based multivariate and univariate analyses reveal the mechanisms underlying the recognition-based production effect: evidence from mixed-list design.

Zhang B, Abdullah A, Yan M, Hou Y, Chen A, McLaren H Front Hum Neurosci. 2025; 19:1507782.

PMID: 39996020 PMC: 11849048. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1507782.


Crossmodal semantic congruence and rarity improve episodic memory.

Packard P, Soto-Faraco S Mem Cognit. 2025; .

PMID: 39971892 DOI: 10.3758/s13421-024-01659-9.


Does expecting external memory support cost recognition memory?.

Kelly M, Karimjee B, Pereira A, Lu X, Risko E Mem Cognit. 2025; .

PMID: 39890707 DOI: 10.3758/s13421-025-01688-y.


Changes in the level of unitization moderate the impact of unitization on associative memory and its underlying processing.

Liu Z, Zhu Y, Song X Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2025; .

PMID: 39762479 DOI: 10.3758/s13415-024-01251-3.


Context familiarity is a third kind of episodic memory distinct from item familiarity and recollection.

Addante R, Clise E, Waechter R, Bengson J, Drane D, Perez-Caban J iScience. 2025; 27(12):111439.

PMID: 39758982 PMC: 11699256. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111439.


References
1.
Ryan J, Althoff R, Whitlow S, Cohen N . Amnesia is a deficit in relational memory. Psychol Sci. 2001; 11(6):454-61. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00288. View

2.
Litman L, Awipi T, Davachi L . Category-specificity in the human medial temporal lobe cortex. Hippocampus. 2008; 19(3):308-19. PMC: 2649983. DOI: 10.1002/hipo.20515. View

3.
BRICKER P, CHAPANIS A . Do incorrectly perceived tachistoscopic stimuli convey some information?. Psychol Rev. 1953; 60(3):181-8. DOI: 10.1037/h0054901. View

4.
Yonelinas A . Recognition memory ROCs for item and associative information: the contribution of recollection and familiarity. Mem Cognit. 1998; 25(6):747-63. DOI: 10.3758/bf03211318. View

5.
Bussey T, Saksida L . Memory, perception, and the ventral visual-perirhinal-hippocampal stream: thinking outside of the boxes. Hippocampus. 2007; 17(9):898-908. DOI: 10.1002/hipo.20320. View